Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Evaluate proof aggregation schemes #11

Open
matthiasgoergens opened this issue Oct 18, 2024 · 3 comments
Open

Evaluate proof aggregation schemes #11

matthiasgoergens opened this issue Oct 18, 2024 · 3 comments
Assignees

Comments

@matthiasgoergens
Copy link
Collaborator

Look into all the different ways to aggregate and compress proves. What are the trade-offs we want to make?

Check whether the approach taken in this repository so far is actually in line with Ceno's goals.

Compare what SP1 and Risc0 etc are doing, and what design considerations they had---we might as well learn from them. (Assuming we can find their deliberations. But we can also ask, Risc0 folks have been very communicative when asked in the past.)

@matthiasgoergens
Copy link
Collaborator Author

I'm still learning about how our base VM works, so I can look more into recursive verification. @Jiangkm3 Please jump in as you see fit.

@kunxian-xia kunxian-xia self-assigned this Oct 29, 2024
@matthiasgoergens matthiasgoergens changed the title Evaluate proof compression schemes Evaluate proof aggregation schemes Oct 29, 2024
@matthiasgoergens
Copy link
Collaborator Author

@Jiangkm3
Copy link
Collaborator

Jiangkm3 commented Nov 5, 2024

We have decided that it is necessary to finish the most rudimentary implementation of the recursive verifier for benchmark testing. We shift our focus to finish that implementation first.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants