You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
The monitor uncertainties are necessarily large at the minimal and maximal wavelengths transported by the guide, where the incident intensity goes to zero -- but the uncertainty relative to the detector uncertainty is probably always small due to the small cross section for inelastic scattering.
I think this deserves some more investigation once we have the full workflow. We should ensure that we can ignore correlations around the edges of the data. Or avoid using those data.
It should. We use it here: https://github.com/scipp/essdiffraction/blob/149203c29be6dd6e5dc49bf910015b308c0afa9e/src/ess/powder/correction.py#L56-L59
I think this deserves some more investigation once we have the full workflow. We should ensure that we can ignore correlations around the edges of the data. Or avoid using those data.
Originally posted by @jl-wynen in #24 (comment)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: