Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

update pamflet dependency #103

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jun 27, 2017
Merged

update pamflet dependency #103

merged 1 commit into from
Jun 27, 2017

Conversation

xuwei-k
Copy link
Member

@xuwei-k xuwei-k commented Jun 25, 2017

@ashawley
Copy link
Contributor

When I run publishLocalfrom Kenji Yoshida's branch here, and then set the sbt-site plugin to version 1.3.0-SNAPSHOT for the sbt web site (currently, 1.0.0-RC2), I no longer get a stack overflow error when running pamflet:mappings on Java 8.

@metasim metasim merged commit ce8feb9 into sbt:develop Jun 27, 2017
@xuwei-k xuwei-k deleted the pamflet branch June 27, 2017 01:12
@metasim
Copy link
Member

metasim commented Jun 27, 2017

@dwijnand @jonas I can't figure out why the travis build is failing on this merge. Something associated with gitbook as best I can tell, which has nothing to do with this PR. Any ideas? It's also failing on MacOS.

@ashawley
Copy link
Contributor

ashawley commented Jul 17, 2017

Maybe something changed with Travis, or something with Node? Looks like it's not possible to reproduce the build in Travis for the commit before this PR. I tried and it failed for the same reason:

https://travis-ci.org/ashawley/sbt-site/builds/254593604

However, the travis-build infrastructure didn't change significantly between commit ids

travis-ci/travis-build@9da6c15...1b50ac7

Who can troubleshoot this issue with node?

@ashawley ashawley mentioned this pull request Jul 29, 2017
@jonas jonas modified the milestone: 1.3.0 Aug 13, 2017
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants