Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Sbt assembly taking too long, sbt 1.0.4, scalaVersion 2.11.8 #286

Open
AnuragNaik opened this issue Dec 21, 2017 · 1 comment
Open

Sbt assembly taking too long, sbt 1.0.4, scalaVersion 2.11.8 #286

AnuragNaik opened this issue Dec 21, 2017 · 1 comment

Comments

@AnuragNaik
Copy link

AnuragNaik commented Dec 21, 2017

Sbt assembly taking long time to complete ("sbt 0.13.16"). Also tried with (sbt 1.0.4), had same issue, this same project is building fine on other machines. Captured JStack while running 'sbt assembly' https://gist.github.com/AnuragNaik/4d214b5cf8517c66694d0a7f57afd205, last few lines of sbt console (sbt 1.0.4).

[warn] Merging 'org/apache/commons/logging/Log.class' with strategy 'first'
[warn] Merging 'org/apache/commons/logging/LogConfigurationException.class' with strategy 'first'
[warn] Merging 'org/apache/commons/logging/LogFactory.class' with strategy 'first'
[warn] Merging 'org/apache/commons/logging/impl/NoOpLog.class' with strategy 'first'
[warn] Merging 'org/apache/commons/logging/impl/SimpleLog$1.class' with strategy 'first'
[warn] Merging 'org/apache/commons/logging/impl/SimpleLog.class' with strategy 'first'
[warn] Merging 'org/apache/spark/unused/UnusedStubClass.class' with strategy 'first'
[warn] Merging 'rootdoc.txt' with strategy 'first'
[warn] Strategy 'discard' was applied to 524 files
[warn] Strategy 'first' was applied to 240 files
[info] SHA-1: 55d93817ff0a70dd7657cdbfc04a77ffd0fc9610
[info] Packaging /Users/anurag/Code/Sherlock/target/scala-2.11/Sherlock-assembly-0.1.jar ...
[info] Done packaging.
[success] Total time: 892 s, completed 21 Dec, 2017 10:26:48 AM

Thanks.

@EnverOsmanov
Copy link

Very similar issue already exists - #68

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants