Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Use international standards for logic operators #186

Open
adrienrougny opened this issue May 2, 2018 · 6 comments
Open

Use international standards for logic operators #186

adrienrougny opened this issue May 2, 2018 · 6 comments

Comments

@adrienrougny
Copy link
Collaborator

No description provided.

@adrienrougny adrienrougny added this to the future milestone May 2, 2018
@hasanbalci
Copy link
Collaborator

What do we mean here by using international standards?

@draeger
Copy link

draeger commented Jul 24, 2024

Yes, please do! My personal preference was always to use either mathematical symbols, i.e., ∧, ∨, ⊻, ¬ or symbols from common programming languages, i.e., &&, ||, !=, ! or similar. From my perspective, it is not a good choice to have English words in those symbols as it is currently.

@hasanbalci
Copy link
Collaborator

hasanbalci commented Jul 25, 2024

There are some concerns discussed during editor's meeting. There is no common language for this and using only one type of language may not solve the problem. Needs more discussion. Which restrictions to be allowed if we want to mix notations? Augustin also suggests going with Python and continue using and, or, not. Rupert states English is the most common language so it might be good to continue using it.

@draeger
Copy link

draeger commented Jul 25, 2024

Mathematics is the most common language.

@adrienrougny
Copy link
Collaborator Author

adrienrougny commented Sep 3, 2024

Discussions at COMBINE: make a vote with clear propositions:

  • keep AND, OR, NOT
  • use logical symbols: ∧, ∨, ¬

@cannin
Copy link
Contributor

cannin commented Sep 3, 2024

If the vote goes for the mathematical symbols, then the change would be for Level 2

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants