Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Logic arc replication #139

Open
cannin opened this issue Apr 14, 2011 · 3 comments
Open

Logic arc replication #139

cannin opened this issue Apr 14, 2011 · 3 comments
Assignees
@cannin
Labels
discussion stage feature reviewed-2024
Milestone
L2+

Comments

@cannin
Copy link
Contributor

cannin commented Apr 14, 2011

Can logic nodes be duplicated? Does that have any meaning?

Reported by: stumoodie
@cannin
Copy link
Contributor Author

cannin commented Apr 16, 2011

  • status: open --> pending

Original comment by: lenov

@cannin
Copy link
Contributor Author

cannin commented Apr 16, 2011

I don't see any logical problem with duplicating a logic node. Except an increased clutter of the map. If all the input and all the output are the same this literally brings no information at all. So the interpretation of the graph would be absolutely identical with or without the duplication. Since we forbid the duplication of processes, I strongly doubt that anyone would consciously duplicate logic nodes. But if they do, a software should be allowed to remove all the duplicates as part of a tidying procedure.

Original comment by: lenov

@cannin cannin self-assigned this Jun 10, 2016
@adrienrougny adrienrougny added this to the future milestone Nov 6, 2023
@hasanbalci
Copy link
Collaborator

hasanbalci commented Jul 8, 2024 •
edited
Loading

We currently allow duplication of logic nodes but it seems that the question here is whether to use clone markers or not. (See section 3.5.3 Cloning).

@hasanbalci hasanbalci modified the milestones: L1V2.1, L2+ Jul 25, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees

@cannin cannin

Labels
discussion stage feature reviewed-2024
Projects
None yet
Milestone
L2+
Development

No branches or pull requests
3 participants
@adrienrougny @cannin @hasanbalci