fix(engine): implement composedPath, srcElement and path for events #859

caridy · 2018-11-24T02:40:28Z

Details

event.composedPath()
event.path => getter alias for .composedPath()
event.srcElement => non-standard that is everywhere (thanks to IE)

Does this PR introduce a breaking change?

No

caridy · 2018-11-24T02:42:43Z

fixes #415
fixes #305

salesforce-best-lwc-internal · 2018-11-24T03:02:16Z

Benchmark results

Base commit: 97bb075 | Target commit: a5caacb

lwc-engine-benchmark

table-append-1k	metric	base(`97bb075`)	target(`a5caacb`)	trend
benchmark-table/append/1k	duration	147.55 (±4.90 ms)	150.05 (±4.35 ms)	+2.5ms (1.7%) 👌

table-clear-1k	metric	base(`97bb075`)	target(`a5caacb`)	trend
benchmark-table/clear/1k	duration	6.15 (±0.45 ms)	6.20 (±0.40 ms)	+0.0ms (0.8%) 👌

table-create-10k	metric	base(`97bb075`)	target(`a5caacb`)	trend
benchmark-table/create/10k	duration	886.10 (±6.10 ms)	880.30 (±6.85 ms)	-5.8ms (0.7%) 👍

table-create-1k	metric	base(`97bb075`)	target(`a5caacb`)	trend
benchmark-table/create/1k	duration	116.80 (±3.55 ms)	116.60 (±2.95 ms)	-0.2ms (0.2%) 👌

table-update-10th-1k	metric	base(`97bb075`)	target(`a5caacb`)	trend
benchmark-table/update-10th/1k	duration	77.00 (±2.65 ms)	78.00 (±2.55 ms)	+1.0ms (1.3%) 👌

tablecmp-append-1k	metric	base(`97bb075`)	target(`a5caacb`)	trend
benchmark-table-component/append/1k	duration	247.90 (±16.40 ms)	256.00 (±8.25 ms)	+8.1ms (3.3%) 👎

tablecmp-clear-1k	metric	base(`97bb075`)	target(`a5caacb`)	trend
benchmark-table-component/clear/1k	duration	11.30 (±1.35 ms)	12.25 (±1.65 ms)	+0.9ms (8.4%) 👌

tablecmp-create-10k	metric	base(`97bb075`)	target(`a5caacb`)	trend
benchmark-table-component/create/10k	duration	1701.95 (±13.70 ms)	1712.30 (±12.30 ms)	+10.4ms (0.6%) 👎

tablecmp-create-1k	metric	base(`97bb075`)	target(`a5caacb`)	trend
benchmark-table-component/create/1k	duration	206.90 (±4.85 ms)	211.25 (±5.35 ms)	+4.3ms (2.1%) 👎

tablecmp-update-10th-1k	metric	base(`97bb075`)	target(`a5caacb`)	trend
benchmark-table-component/update-10th/1k	duration	70.50 (±5.25 ms)	70.85 (±4.30 ms)	+0.3ms (0.5%) 👌

wc-append-1k	metric	base(`97bb075`)	target(`a5caacb`)	trend
benchmark-table-wc/append/1k	duration	251.40 (±11.10 ms)	254.70 (±10.85 ms)	+3.3ms (1.3%) 👌

wc-clear-1k	metric	base(`97bb075`)	target(`a5caacb`)	trend
benchmark-table-wc/clear/1k	duration	21.35 (±2.50 ms)	23.10 (±2.80 ms)	+1.8ms (8.2%) 👎

wc-create-10k	metric	base(`97bb075`)	target(`a5caacb`)	trend
benchmark-table-wc/create/10k	duration	1817.55 (±50.80 ms)	1833.65 (±38.80 ms)	+16.1ms (0.9%) 👌

wc-create-1k	metric	base(`97bb075`)	target(`a5caacb`)	trend
benchmark-table-wc/create/1k	duration	224.20 (±4.70 ms)	223.85 (±3.50 ms)	-0.3ms (0.2%) 👌

wc-update-10th-1k	metric	base(`97bb075`)	target(`a5caacb`)	trend
benchmark-table-wc/update-10th/1k	duration	72.85 (±6.45 ms)	72.95 (±6.55 ms)	+0.1ms (0.1%) 👌

davidturissini

Confirmed, srcElement is retargeted

pmdartus · 2018-11-27T14:15:36Z

@caridy Don't we need tests for this?

caridy · 2018-11-27T20:15:18Z

@pmdartus added the tests.
@diervo rebased.

salesforce-best-lwc-internal · 2018-11-27T20:35:43Z

Benchmark results

Base commit: 6a20ae0 | Target commit: d5886a1

lwc-engine-benchmark

table-append-1k	metric	base(`6a20ae0`)	target(`d5886a1`)	trend
benchmark-table/append/1k	duration	150.35 (±4.20 ms)	149.15 (±3.50 ms)	-1.2ms (0.8%) 👌

table-clear-1k	metric	base(`6a20ae0`)	target(`d5886a1`)	trend
benchmark-table/clear/1k	duration	6.20 (±0.50 ms)	6.20 (±0.45 ms)	0.0ms (0.0%) 👌

table-create-10k	metric	base(`6a20ae0`)	target(`d5886a1`)	trend
benchmark-table/create/10k	duration	875.00 (±6.00 ms)	891.45 (±6.85 ms)	+16.5ms (1.9%) 👎

table-create-1k	metric	base(`6a20ae0`)	target(`d5886a1`)	trend
benchmark-table/create/1k	duration	116.00 (±3.35 ms)	119.85 (±3.70 ms)	+3.8ms (3.3%) 👎

table-update-10th-1k	metric	base(`6a20ae0`)	target(`d5886a1`)	trend
benchmark-table/update-10th/1k	duration	76.45 (±2.20 ms)	76.80 (±1.80 ms)	+0.4ms (0.5%) 👌

tablecmp-append-1k	metric	base(`6a20ae0`)	target(`d5886a1`)	trend
benchmark-table-component/append/1k	duration	247.95 (±10.65 ms)	252.70 (±9.45 ms)	+4.8ms (1.9%) 👎

tablecmp-clear-1k	metric	base(`6a20ae0`)	target(`d5886a1`)	trend
benchmark-table-component/clear/1k	duration	11.75 (±1.95 ms)	12.50 (±1.70 ms)	+0.8ms (6.4%) 👌

tablecmp-create-10k	metric	base(`6a20ae0`)	target(`d5886a1`)	trend
benchmark-table-component/create/10k	duration	1725.55 (±11.75 ms)	1715.65 (±11.45 ms)	-9.9ms (0.6%) 👍

tablecmp-create-1k	metric	base(`6a20ae0`)	target(`d5886a1`)	trend
benchmark-table-component/create/1k	duration	204.80 (±6.00 ms)	209.10 (±5.85 ms)	+4.3ms (2.1%) 👌

tablecmp-update-10th-1k	metric	base(`6a20ae0`)	target(`d5886a1`)	trend
benchmark-table-component/update-10th/1k	duration	72.60 (±4.75 ms)	72.50 (±5.85 ms)	-0.1ms (0.1%) 👌

wc-append-1k	metric	base(`6a20ae0`)	target(`d5886a1`)	trend
benchmark-table-wc/append/1k	duration	253.35 (±7.40 ms)	258.00 (±8.10 ms)	+4.7ms (1.8%) 👎

wc-clear-1k	metric	base(`6a20ae0`)	target(`d5886a1`)	trend
benchmark-table-wc/clear/1k	duration	21.35 (±1.95 ms)	22.60 (±2.30 ms)	+1.3ms (5.9%) 👌

wc-create-10k	metric	base(`6a20ae0`)	target(`d5886a1`)	trend
benchmark-table-wc/create/10k	duration	1831.60 (±60.35 ms)	1836.50 (±34.05 ms)	+4.9ms (0.3%) 👌

wc-create-1k	metric	base(`6a20ae0`)	target(`d5886a1`)	trend
benchmark-table-wc/create/1k	duration	223.25 (±4.60 ms)	228.30 (±6.25 ms)	+5.1ms (2.3%) 👎

wc-update-10th-1k	metric	base(`6a20ae0`)	target(`d5886a1`)	trend
benchmark-table-wc/update-10th/1k	duration	72.60 (±6.05 ms)	70.55 (±4.10 ms)	-2.0ms (2.8%) 👌

salesforce-best-lwc-internal · 2018-11-28T00:24:11Z

Benchmark results

Base commit: 6a20ae0 | Target commit: d5886a1

lwc-engine-benchmark

table-append-1k	metric	base(`6a20ae0`)	target(`d5886a1`)	trend
benchmark-table/append/1k	duration	150.35 (±4.20 ms)	151.60 (±4.30 ms)	+1.2ms (0.8%) 👌

table-clear-1k	metric	base(`6a20ae0`)	target(`d5886a1`)	trend
benchmark-table/clear/1k	duration	6.20 (±0.50 ms)	6.40 (±0.50 ms)	+0.2ms (3.2%) 👌

table-create-10k	metric	base(`6a20ae0`)	target(`d5886a1`)	trend
benchmark-table/create/10k	duration	875.00 (±6.00 ms)	884.10 (±7.40 ms)	+9.1ms (1.0%) 👎

table-create-1k	metric	base(`6a20ae0`)	target(`d5886a1`)	trend
benchmark-table/create/1k	duration	116.00 (±3.35 ms)	117.85 (±3.35 ms)	+1.8ms (1.6%) 👎

table-update-10th-1k	metric	base(`6a20ae0`)	target(`d5886a1`)	trend
benchmark-table/update-10th/1k	duration	76.45 (±2.20 ms)	84.50 (±6.30 ms)	+8.0ms (10.5%) 👎

tablecmp-append-1k	metric	base(`6a20ae0`)	target(`d5886a1`)	trend
benchmark-table-component/append/1k	duration	247.95 (±10.65 ms)	253.00 (±5.20 ms)	+5.1ms (2.0%) 👎

tablecmp-clear-1k	metric	base(`6a20ae0`)	target(`d5886a1`)	trend
benchmark-table-component/clear/1k	duration	11.75 (±1.95 ms)	13.10 (±1.70 ms)	+1.3ms (11.5%) 👎

tablecmp-create-10k	metric	base(`6a20ae0`)	target(`d5886a1`)	trend
benchmark-table-component/create/10k	duration	1725.55 (±11.75 ms)	1712.45 (±11.90 ms)	-13.1ms (0.8%) 👍

tablecmp-create-1k	metric	base(`6a20ae0`)	target(`d5886a1`)	trend
benchmark-table-component/create/1k	duration	204.80 (±6.00 ms)	211.95 (±6.00 ms)	+7.1ms (3.5%) 👎

tablecmp-update-10th-1k	metric	base(`6a20ae0`)	target(`d5886a1`)	trend
benchmark-table-component/update-10th/1k	duration	72.60 (±4.75 ms)	73.05 (±5.95 ms)	+0.5ms (0.6%) 👌

wc-append-1k	metric	base(`6a20ae0`)	target(`d5886a1`)	trend
benchmark-table-wc/append/1k	duration	253.35 (±7.40 ms)	259.95 (±9.65 ms)	+6.6ms (2.6%) 👌

wc-clear-1k	metric	base(`6a20ae0`)	target(`d5886a1`)	trend
benchmark-table-wc/clear/1k	duration	21.35 (±1.95 ms)	23.60 (±2.45 ms)	+2.3ms (10.5%) 👎

wc-create-10k	metric	base(`6a20ae0`)	target(`d5886a1`)	trend
benchmark-table-wc/create/10k	duration	1831.60 (±60.35 ms)	1869.05 (±35.40 ms)	+37.5ms (2.0%) 👎

wc-create-1k	metric	base(`6a20ae0`)	target(`d5886a1`)	trend
benchmark-table-wc/create/1k	duration	223.25 (±4.60 ms)	225.65 (±5.45 ms)	+2.4ms (1.1%) 👌

wc-update-10th-1k	metric	base(`6a20ae0`)	target(`d5886a1`)	trend
benchmark-table-wc/update-10th/1k	duration	72.60 (±6.05 ms)	74.20 (±4.25 ms)	+1.6ms (2.2%) 👌

caridy · 2019-01-02T19:22:54Z

@ravijayaramappa let's validate what locker does for srcElement and path property, and the composedPath() method. If locker can protect us until 220, then we should do that.

Note: srcElement is just an alias of target.

ravijayaramappa · 2019-01-02T21:48:49Z

Under locker,

srcElement
- Property is exposed
- The raw value is filtered to apply namespace rules and then wrapped in a SecureElement
- Customers could be using it. Higher chance of a regression if locker blocks it without notice.
path
- Property is exposed
- The raw array is wrapped in a proxy. On access, array values are filtered to apply namespace rules and either wrapped in a SecureElement or an opaque(no properties) object
- This one should be low risk to block in locker. Since this is a non-standard property, chances of a customer regression is low.
- User story for Locker to assess this property W-5694860
composedPath()
- Property is exposed but has never worked as expected. It does not work because the property is exposed incorrectly.
- This one should be low risk to block in locker because it has never worked. So chances of customer regression is very low. There might be customers who have sniffing if a such a property exists on an event, but nothing beyond that.
- User story for Locker to assess this property W-5694762

caridy · 2019-01-07T20:15:19Z

locker will protect us for now, until we can clean this up.

salesforce-best-lwc-internal · 2019-01-17T19:43:40Z

Benchmark results

Base commit: 6eb7eda | Target commit: 6244d1c

lwc-engine-benchmark

table-append-1k	metric	base(`6eb7eda`)	target(`6244d1c`)	trend
benchmark-table/append/1k	duration	155.60 (±5.65 ms)	152.35 (±5.00 ms)	-3.3ms (2.1%) 👌

table-clear-1k	metric	base(`6eb7eda`)	target(`6244d1c`)	trend
benchmark-table/clear/1k	duration	6.25 (±0.40 ms)	6.30 (±0.40 ms)	+0.0ms (0.8%) 👌

table-create-10k	metric	base(`6eb7eda`)	target(`6244d1c`)	trend
benchmark-table/create/10k	duration	931.65 (±5.60 ms)	917.85 (±7.20 ms)	-13.8ms (1.5%) 👍

table-create-1k	metric	base(`6eb7eda`)	target(`6244d1c`)	trend
benchmark-table/create/1k	duration	120.80 (±3.05 ms)	121.60 (±2.90 ms)	+0.8ms (0.7%) 👌

table-update-10th-1k	metric	base(`6eb7eda`)	target(`6244d1c`)	trend
benchmark-table/update-10th/1k	duration	77.15 (±3.00 ms)	88.45 (±2.00 ms)	+11.3ms (14.6%) 👎

tablecmp-append-1k	metric	base(`6eb7eda`)	target(`6244d1c`)	trend
benchmark-table-component/append/1k	duration	257.45 (±8.40 ms)	256.10 (±7.45 ms)	-1.4ms (0.5%) 👌

tablecmp-clear-1k	metric	base(`6eb7eda`)	target(`6244d1c`)	trend
benchmark-table-component/clear/1k	duration	12.35 (±1.55 ms)	12.10 (±1.65 ms)	-0.3ms (2.0%) 👌

tablecmp-create-10k	metric	base(`6eb7eda`)	target(`6244d1c`)	trend
benchmark-table-component/create/10k	duration	1781.45 (±18.20 ms)	1763.25 (±24.05 ms)	-18.2ms (1.0%) 👍

tablecmp-create-1k	metric	base(`6eb7eda`)	target(`6244d1c`)	trend
benchmark-table-component/create/1k	duration	214.60 (±4.70 ms)	209.35 (±5.05 ms)	-5.2ms (2.4%) 👌

tablecmp-update-10th-1k	metric	base(`6eb7eda`)	target(`6244d1c`)	trend
benchmark-table-component/update-10th/1k	duration	72.40 (±5.05 ms)	69.90 (±3.55 ms)	-2.5ms (3.5%) 👌

wc-append-1k	metric	base(`6eb7eda`)	target(`6244d1c`)	trend
benchmark-table-wc/append/1k	duration	261.80 (±5.55 ms)	259.45 (±5.05 ms)	-2.3ms (0.9%) 👌

wc-clear-1k	metric	base(`6eb7eda`)	target(`6244d1c`)	trend
benchmark-table-wc/clear/1k	duration	23.10 (±2.30 ms)	23.15 (±2.20 ms)	+0.0ms (0.2%) 👌

wc-create-10k	metric	base(`6eb7eda`)	target(`6244d1c`)	trend
benchmark-table-wc/create/10k	duration	2011.55 (±10.45 ms)	1993.05 (±10.90 ms)	-18.5ms (0.9%) 👍

wc-create-1k	metric	base(`6eb7eda`)	target(`6244d1c`)	trend
benchmark-table-wc/create/1k	duration	229.15 (±5.10 ms)	221.70 (±3.70 ms)	-7.4ms (3.3%) 👍

wc-update-10th-1k	metric	base(`6eb7eda`)	target(`6244d1c`)	trend
benchmark-table-wc/update-10th/1k	duration	73.20 (±4.50 ms)	74.20 (±5.00 ms)	+1.0ms (1.4%) 👌

caridy · 2019-01-18T20:21:11Z

validated that the failures in compat are flappers, merging!

salesforce-best-lwc-internal · 2019-01-18T20:34:16Z

Benchmark results

Base commit: 5c16e22 | Target commit: 6244d1c

lwc-engine-benchmark

table-append-1k	metric	base(`5c16e22`)	target(`6244d1c`)	trend
benchmark-table/append/1k	duration	149.20 (±5.05 ms)	148.75 (±4.60 ms)	-0.4ms (0.3%) 👌

table-clear-1k	metric	base(`5c16e22`)	target(`6244d1c`)	trend
benchmark-table/clear/1k	duration	5.70 (±0.40 ms)	6.30 (±0.45 ms)	+0.6ms (10.5%) 👎

table-create-10k	metric	base(`5c16e22`)	target(`6244d1c`)	trend
benchmark-table/create/10k	duration	865.20 (±9.75 ms)	907.70 (±6.60 ms)	+42.5ms (4.9%) 👎

table-create-1k	metric	base(`5c16e22`)	target(`6244d1c`)	trend
benchmark-table/create/1k	duration	116.75 (±3.35 ms)	119.75 (±2.75 ms)	+3.0ms (2.6%) 👎

table-update-10th-1k	metric	base(`5c16e22`)	target(`6244d1c`)	trend
benchmark-table/update-10th/1k	duration	85.20 (±2.25 ms)	76.40 (±2.60 ms)	-8.8ms (10.3%) 👍

tablecmp-append-1k	metric	base(`5c16e22`)	target(`6244d1c`)	trend
benchmark-table-component/append/1k	duration	220.45 (±14.35 ms)	250.55 (±7.65 ms)	+30.1ms (13.7%) 👎

tablecmp-clear-1k	metric	base(`5c16e22`)	target(`6244d1c`)	trend
benchmark-table-component/clear/1k	duration	12.25 (±1.95 ms)	11.95 (±1.70 ms)	-0.3ms (2.4%) 👌

tablecmp-create-10k	metric	base(`5c16e22`)	target(`6244d1c`)	trend
benchmark-table-component/create/10k	duration	1759.20 (±15.00 ms)	1771.65 (±18.70 ms)	+12.5ms (0.7%) 👎

tablecmp-create-1k	metric	base(`5c16e22`)	target(`6244d1c`)	trend
benchmark-table-component/create/1k	duration	208.60 (±5.85 ms)	209.75 (±5.95 ms)	+1.2ms (0.6%) 👌

tablecmp-update-10th-1k	metric	base(`5c16e22`)	target(`6244d1c`)	trend
benchmark-table-component/update-10th/1k	duration	69.90 (±4.85 ms)	72.00 (±6.30 ms)	+2.1ms (3.0%) 👌

wc-append-1k	metric	base(`5c16e22`)	target(`6244d1c`)	trend
benchmark-table-wc/append/1k	duration	256.70 (±6.15 ms)	254.60 (±5.85 ms)	-2.1ms (0.8%) 👌

wc-clear-1k	metric	base(`5c16e22`)	target(`6244d1c`)	trend
benchmark-table-wc/clear/1k	duration	21.65 (±2.15 ms)	21.50 (±3.15 ms)	-0.1ms (0.7%) 👌

wc-create-10k	metric	base(`5c16e22`)	target(`6244d1c`)	trend
benchmark-table-wc/create/10k	duration	1980.10 (±12.80 ms)	1994.20 (±9.85 ms)	+14.1ms (0.7%) 👎

wc-create-1k	metric	base(`5c16e22`)	target(`6244d1c`)	trend
benchmark-table-wc/create/1k	duration	221.50 (±5.25 ms)	222.55 (±4.60 ms)	+1.1ms (0.5%) 👌

wc-update-10th-1k	metric	base(`5c16e22`)	target(`6244d1c`)	trend
benchmark-table-wc/update-10th/1k	duration	68.55 (±4.35 ms)	70.95 (±5.70 ms)	+2.4ms (3.5%) 👌

…events (#859)" This reverts commit c415ece.

…events (#859)" (#983) This reverts commit c415ece.

…ath for events (#859)" (#983)" This reverts commit 2da65c1.

…ath for events (#859)" (#983)" (#993) This reverts commit 2da65c1.

caridy requested a review from davidturissini November 24, 2018 02:40

davidturissini approved these changes Nov 27, 2018

View reviewed changes

caridy force-pushed the caridy/event-retargeting-compleition branch from a5caacb to d5886a1 Compare November 27, 2018 20:14

pmdartus approved these changes Nov 28, 2018

View reviewed changes

diervo added the nomerge label Dec 14, 2018

caridy added this to the 220 milestone Jan 7, 2019

caridy added 3 commits January 17, 2019 14:21

fix(engine): composedPath, srcElement and path for events

13740c0

fix(engine): autoimport hazzard

af54d46

fix(engine): adding tests for composedPath, rebasing

6244d1c

caridy force-pushed the caridy/event-retargeting-compleition branch from d5886a1 to 6244d1c Compare January 17, 2019 19:28

caridy removed the nomerge label Jan 17, 2019

caridy merged commit c415ece into master Jan 18, 2019

caridy deleted the caridy/event-retargeting-compleition branch January 18, 2019 20:22

ekashida added a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 18, 2019

Revert "fix(engine): implement composedPath, srcElement and path for …

3cce510

…events (#859)" This reverts commit c415ece.

ekashida mentioned this pull request Jan 18, 2019

Revert "fix(engine): implement composedPath, srcElement and path for … #983

Merged

ravijayaramappa pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 19, 2019

Revert "fix(engine): implement composedPath, srcElement and path for …

2da65c1

…events (#859)" (#983) This reverts commit c415ece.

ekashida added a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 21, 2019

Revert "Revert "fix(engine): implement composedPath, srcElement and p…

60c948b

…ath for events (#859)" (#983)" This reverts commit 2da65c1.

ekashida mentioned this pull request Jan 21, 2019

Revert "Revert "fix(engine): implement composedPath, srcElement and p… #993

Merged

ravijayaramappa pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 21, 2019

Revert "Revert "fix(engine): implement composedPath, srcElement and p…

8c5076e

…ath for events (#859)" (#983)" (#993) This reverts commit 2da65c1.

This was referenced Mar 11, 2019

Restrict access to event path information #305

Closed

Block access to event.srcElement #415

Closed

bmblb mentioned this pull request May 15, 2020

event.composedPath() throws #1875

Open

Provide feedback

Saved searches

Use saved searches to filter your results more quickly

fix(engine): implement composedPath, srcElement and path for events #859

fix(engine): implement composedPath, srcElement and path for events #859

caridy commented Nov 24, 2018

caridy commented Nov 24, 2018

salesforce-best-lwc-internal bot commented Nov 24, 2018

davidturissini left a comment

pmdartus commented Nov 27, 2018

caridy commented Nov 27, 2018

salesforce-best-lwc-internal bot commented Nov 27, 2018

salesforce-best-lwc-internal bot commented Nov 28, 2018

caridy commented Jan 2, 2019

ravijayaramappa commented Jan 2, 2019 •

edited

Loading

caridy commented Jan 7, 2019

salesforce-best-lwc-internal bot commented Jan 17, 2019

caridy commented Jan 18, 2019

salesforce-best-lwc-internal bot commented Jan 18, 2019

fix(engine): implement composedPath, srcElement and path for events #859

fix(engine): implement composedPath, srcElement and path for events #859

Conversation

caridy commented Nov 24, 2018

Details

Does this PR introduce a breaking change?

caridy commented Nov 24, 2018

salesforce-best-lwc-internal bot commented Nov 24, 2018

Benchmark results

lwc-engine-benchmark

davidturissini left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

pmdartus commented Nov 27, 2018

caridy commented Nov 27, 2018

salesforce-best-lwc-internal bot commented Nov 27, 2018

Benchmark results

lwc-engine-benchmark

salesforce-best-lwc-internal bot commented Nov 28, 2018

Benchmark results

lwc-engine-benchmark

caridy commented Jan 2, 2019

ravijayaramappa commented Jan 2, 2019 • edited Loading

caridy commented Jan 7, 2019

salesforce-best-lwc-internal bot commented Jan 17, 2019

Benchmark results

lwc-engine-benchmark

caridy commented Jan 18, 2019

salesforce-best-lwc-internal bot commented Jan 18, 2019

Benchmark results

lwc-engine-benchmark

ravijayaramappa commented Jan 2, 2019 •

edited

Loading