-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 491
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Remove pipfile #39031
Merged
Merged
Remove pipfile #39031
+2
−70
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Documentation preview for this PR (built with commit 5773e0b; changes) is ready! 🎉 |
fchapoton
approved these changes
Nov 26, 2024
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
ok, as you wish
Thanks for the review! |
vbraun
pushed a commit
to vbraun/sage
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 6, 2024
<!-- ^ Please provide a concise and informative title. --> <!-- ^ Don't put issue numbers in the title, do this in the PR description below. --> <!-- ^ For example, instead of "Fixes sagemath#12345" use "Introduce new method to calculate 1 + 2". --> <!-- v Describe your changes below in detail. --> <!-- v Why is this change required? What problem does it solve? --> <!-- v If this PR resolves an open issue, please link to it here. For example, "Fixes sagemath#12345". --> A few years ago I made some experiements with pipenv and added these `pipfile`'s in the progress. I no longer think this is a valuable strategy for sage (e.g `uv` seems to better align with the current philosohpy). Thus, the pipfiles can be deleted again. ### 📝 Checklist <!-- Put an `x` in all the boxes that apply. --> - [ ] The title is concise and informative. - [ ] The description explains in detail what this PR is about. - [ ] I have linked a relevant issue or discussion. - [ ] I have created tests covering the changes. - [ ] I have updated the documentation and checked the documentation preview. ### ⌛ Dependencies <!-- List all open PRs that this PR logically depends on. For example, --> <!-- - sagemath#12345: short description why this is a dependency --> <!-- - sagemath#34567: ... --> URL: sagemath#39031 Reported by: Tobias Diez Reviewer(s): Frédéric Chapoton
vbraun
pushed a commit
to vbraun/sage
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 8, 2024
<!-- ^ Please provide a concise and informative title. --> <!-- ^ Don't put issue numbers in the title, do this in the PR description below. --> <!-- ^ For example, instead of "Fixes sagemath#12345" use "Introduce new method to calculate 1 + 2". --> <!-- v Describe your changes below in detail. --> <!-- v Why is this change required? What problem does it solve? --> <!-- v If this PR resolves an open issue, please link to it here. For example, "Fixes sagemath#12345". --> A few years ago I made some experiements with pipenv and added these `pipfile`'s in the progress. I no longer think this is a valuable strategy for sage (e.g `uv` seems to better align with the current philosohpy). Thus, the pipfiles can be deleted again. ### 📝 Checklist <!-- Put an `x` in all the boxes that apply. --> - [ ] The title is concise and informative. - [ ] The description explains in detail what this PR is about. - [ ] I have linked a relevant issue or discussion. - [ ] I have created tests covering the changes. - [ ] I have updated the documentation and checked the documentation preview. ### ⌛ Dependencies <!-- List all open PRs that this PR logically depends on. For example, --> <!-- - sagemath#12345: short description why this is a dependency --> <!-- - sagemath#34567: ... --> URL: sagemath#39031 Reported by: Tobias Diez Reviewer(s): Frédéric Chapoton
5 tasks
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
A few years ago I made some experiements with pipenv and added these
pipfile
's in the progress. I no longer think this is a valuable strategy for sage (e.guv
seems to better align with the current philosohpy). Thus, the pipfiles can be deleted again.📝 Checklist
⌛ Dependencies