We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
define_implicitly
The following should (probably) work after #37033, but doesn't:
sage: h = SymmetricFunctions(QQ).h() sage: L.<t, u> = LazyPowerSeriesRing(h) sage: D = L.undefined() sage: s1 = L.sum(lambda n: h[n]*t^(n+1)*u^(n-1), 1) sage: L.define_implicitly([D], [u*D - u - u*s1*D - t*(D - D(t, 0))]) sage: D
This involves various shortcomings of the ring of symmetric functions, in particular, that it does not come with a fraction field, see #34347
implement the missing methods
live without.
No response
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.
Problem Description
The following should (probably) work after #37033, but doesn't:
This involves various shortcomings of the ring of symmetric functions, in particular, that it does not come with a fraction field, see #34347
Proposed Solution
implement the missing methods
Alternatives Considered
live without.
Additional Information
No response
Is there an existing issue for this?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: