-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 482
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add some methods to projective morphisms (rational maps) #33953
Comments
Author: Kwankyu Lee |
Branch: u/klee/33953 |
Commit: |
Branch pushed to git repo; I updated commit sha1. New commits:
|
Dependencies: #33950 |
Branch pushed to git repo; I updated commit sha1. New commits:
|
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
Branch pushed to git repo; I updated commit sha1. New commits:
|
Branch pushed to git repo; I updated commit sha1. This was a forced push. New commits:
|
Branch pushed to git repo; I updated commit sha1. This was a forced push. New commits:
|
Branch pushed to git repo; I updated commit sha1. New commits:
|
comment:14
There seems to be some real doctest failures reported by the patchbot:
which I can reproduce. The others
I cannot. Here are my comments: Since Perhaps we should call |
comment:15
Also, if you could split this line: -n1 = n + 1; m1 = m + 1
+n1 = n + 1
+m1 = m + 1 for our style guidelines (see patchbot). |
comment:16
Replying to @tscrim:
Yes. It is related with a deep-rooted problem of conic curves modules. I am working on it. If I fail, then I would simply change the doctest slightly. |
comment:18
Replying to @tscrim:
Fixed.
Done. Also
Yes. Done. |
comment:19
Replying to @tscrim:
Done. Thanks. |
Reviewer: Travis Scrimshaw |
comment:21
Thank you. Green bot => positive review. |
Changed branch from u/klee/33953 to |
Add
graph()
,projective_degrees()
anddegree()
methods to projective morphisms (rational maps).Projective morphisms in Sage represent rational maps. That is, the domain of the definition of the morphism could be a dense subset of its domain.
Depends on #33950
Component: algebraic geometry
Author: Kwankyu Lee
Branch/Commit:
ac60efe
Reviewer: Travis Scrimshaw
Issue created by migration from https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/33953
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: