-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 481
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
absolute_field() for towers of finite fields #26103
Comments
comment:1
See #25976 for a followup and MCLF/mclf#103 for some context. |
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
Branch: u/saraedum/26103 |
New commits:
|
Commit: |
Dependencies: #26105 |
Branch pushed to git repo; I updated commit sha1. New commits:
|
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
comment:7
Without proper support for morphisms with base_morphisms, the output is slightly ugly:
Unfortunately, this does not work yet if we add another extension on top:
The problem is that even though New commits:
|
Branch pushed to git repo; I updated commit sha1. New commits:
|
comment:9
It only gets worse for larger towers:
|
Branch pushed to git repo; I updated commit sha1. New commits:
|
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
Changed keywords from finite fields, polynomial quotient ring to finite fields, polynomial quotient ring, padicBordeaux |
comment:15
https://gitlab.com/sagemath/sage/-/merge_requests/33 implements this in a more general way it seems. So what's been done here is probably irrelevant. |
Towers of finite fields are hard to work with because they lose most of the nice functionality of simple extensions of prime finite fields and are also much slower.
Therefore it would be useful to have a method that turns a tower into a simple extension.
Note that there have been attempts to support relative extensions of finite fields in #21413 and that there is also
sage.coding.relative_finite_field_extension
, the state of which is unclear to me. There is also_isomorphic_ring
on polynomial quotient rings which does something similar so this should probably be unified for finite fields.Depends on #26105
Depends on #26161
CC: @sagetrac-swewers @roed314
Component: finite rings
Keywords: finite fields, polynomial quotient ring, padicBordeaux
Branch/Commit: u/saraedum/26103 @
0f7c2c9
Issue created by migration from https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/26103
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: