-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 482
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Upgrade to sagenb 0.10.7 #14330
Comments
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
Dependencies: #10637 |
comment:5
Any ETA on this? |
comment:6
It should be in by the next release. Too late for 5.9. |
comment:7
I'm aware of that, but it would be nice to get it in an early 5.10 beta since sagenb won't work in the git releases until this is merged. |
comment:8
ppurka just cleaned up a bunch of PRs so I think I'll release 0.10.6 now. Hang on a bit. |
comment:9
OK, SPKG is up. |
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
comment:11
Replying to @dimpase:
If I am not incorrect, these patches are upstream already. So, #10637 is indeed a dependency of this ticket. |
comment:12
Replying to @ppurka:
If so, the instructions on #10637 are quite unclear. |
comment:13
Fixed. |
comment:14
The notebook spkg works fine for me. I have a question though, now that ldap is in the notebook. Are there any other (system) requirements for getting the ldap functionality working? |
comment:15
PS: the value of a
or
|
comment:16
|
comment:17
@jdemeyer Can you say why there are |
comment:18
When using this ticket, I get the following problem with
|
comment:19
Are you using the git version of sage-5.9.rc1? I have seen this when using the git version and it is a known bug. Normal sage-5.9.rc1 worked fine here (Linux). |
comment:20
No, just the git version of the sagenb (latest). I don't know how to use the git version of 5.9.rc1 :) |
comment:21
Ok. I have tested
All of them work. |
comment:22
In
MathJax is licensed under Apache 2.0, which is compatible with GPLv3 but not GPLv2. |
comment:23
Also in
|
comment:67
If this is the case, perhaps we should not ship sanitation with Sage. Those who run world-accessible servers should know what they are doing, what are the risks, and how to deal with them, in particular they are free to install the branch with sanitation. For those who run servers for trusted/known users only, sanitation is not really necessary... |
comment:68
I just tried and it is possible to remove (not revert) the commits by running
and removing the commits corresponding to
Then we need to push (force) this update to sagenb master. Do we want to do that? Will this automatically revert the status of jason's pull request to "open" again? |
comment:69
No, we don't want to force push to master. That's a very bad practice and will screw up anyone else who has pulled from the repo since I released 0.10.7. This will have to be 0.10.7.1, I'm afraid :P I'll cut it, give me a sec |
comment:70
New SPKG: http://wstein.org/home/keshav/files/sagenb-0.10.7.1.spkg |
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
Changed reviewer from Dmitrii Pasechnik to Dmitrii Pasechnik, Karl-Dieter Crisman, Jeroen Demeyer, Andrey Novoseltsev, Punarbasu Purkayastha |
comment:72
Thanks Keshav, published formulas and pictures are back, will keep testing! |
comment:73
Thanks for catching this, Andrey! Sorry for missing this somehow :( |
comment:74
I see 3D plots show up fine (the 2D static version at least), and plots show up fine. I think this ticket is good to go. |
Branch: u/tkluck/ticket/134330 |
Changed branch from u/tkluck/ticket/134330 to u/tkluck/ticket/14330 |
comment:78
I also put the tarball on http://www.infty.nl/misc/sagenb-0.10.7.1.tar.gz |
comment:79
Why does this ticket depend on #10637? On the one hand, we need to update to version 0.10.7.1 of the notebook to be able to switch to the integrated git repository. On the other hand, we try to keep the number of changes to a minimum. Is it okay to update the sage notebook in the git repository without applying #10637 there? |
comment:80
Replying to @tkluck:
The changes to the notebook to support sws2rst have already been merged and is present in 0.10.7.1. As such you don't really need to apply #10637 to Sage to get a functional notebook. You won't lose any functionality in Sage, except that the sws2rst option won't be present. Doctests in sagenb should not fail, as long as you do not doctest the optional parts. |
Changed work issues from published formulas to none |
Merged: sage-5.12.beta0 |
Next minor version of sagenb. Will contain LDAP functionality by Robin Martinjak (finally) and some other minor adjustments.
SPKG: http://wstein.org/home/keshav/files/sagenb-0.10.7.1.spkg
When this is merged, merge also #14273.
Depends on #10637
CC: @novoselt @ppurka @ohanar @kcrisman
Component: packages: standard
Author: Keshav Kini
Branch: u/tkluck/ticket/14330
Reviewer: Dmitrii Pasechnik, Karl-Dieter Crisman, Jeroen Demeyer, Andrey Novoseltsev, Punarbasu Purkayastha
Merged: sage-5.12.beta0
Issue created by migration from https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/14330
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: