Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Better code authentication on crates.io #18

Open
Shnatsel opened this issue Jan 8, 2019 · 3 comments
Open

Better code authentication on crates.io #18

Shnatsel opened this issue Jan 8, 2019 · 3 comments

Comments

@Shnatsel
Copy link
Member

Shnatsel commented Jan 8, 2019

crates.io currently lacks a number of fairly basic security features, such as requiring signatures from several maintainers to issue a package release.

Designing a solution for this from scratch or gradually patching for more and more stuff sound like dubious undertakings. Fortunately, The Update Framework provides a fairly comprehensive solution that is not overly tedious for crate maintainers. A Rust implementation is in progress.

Discussion on crates.io issue tracker: rust-lang/crates.io#75

@Shnatsel Shnatsel changed the title Better code authentication Better code authentication on crates.io Jan 8, 2019
@tarcieri
Copy link
Member

tarcieri commented Jan 8, 2019

Here's a proposal I wrote to use TUF for crates.io signing withoutboats/rfcs#7

@heavypackets
Copy link

I've yet to get through all of the prior work done so far in detail, but this will be a high priority through the rest of the year for me. I will say, there are a lot parallels here to Notary which I now help maintain. Notary uses TUF metadata in a way similar to what has been proposed, so there is some prior art to reference to also help ramp his effort back up. Are there any current items in progress?

@tarcieri
Copy link
Member

@heavypackets my linked proposal in the previous post is the last I know of to integrate TUF into crates.io.

It’s something I’ve been meaning to work on when I have some spare cycles.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants