Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Restructure std::rt (part 2) #89068

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Oct 31, 2021
Merged

Restructure std::rt (part 2) #89068

merged 4 commits into from
Oct 31, 2021

Conversation

bjorn3
Copy link
Member

@bjorn3 bjorn3 commented Sep 18, 2021

A couple more cleanups on top of #89011

Blocked on #89011

@bjorn3 bjorn3 added C-cleanup Category: PRs that clean code up or issues documenting cleanup. T-libs-api Relevant to the library API team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. S-blocked Status: Blocked on something else such as an RFC or other implementation work. labels Sep 18, 2021
@rust-highfive
Copy link
Collaborator

r? @yaahc

(rust-highfive has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override)

@rust-highfive rust-highfive added the S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. label Sep 18, 2021
@rust-log-analyzer

This comment has been minimized.

@JohnCSimon JohnCSimon added S-waiting-on-author Status: This is awaiting some action (such as code changes or more information) from the author. and removed S-blocked Status: Blocked on something else such as an RFC or other implementation work. S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Oct 3, 2021
@JohnCSimon
Copy link
Member

Triage:
@bjorn3 returning to author and removing blocked tag because #89011 is merged

@bjorn3 bjorn3 added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. and removed S-waiting-on-author Status: This is awaiting some action (such as code changes or more information) from the author. labels Oct 3, 2021
@rust-log-analyzer

This comment has been minimized.

@joshtriplett
Copy link
Member

Would putting #[inline(always)] on Handler::null generate the same code?

instead of through the Drop impl for Handler
@bjorn3
Copy link
Member Author

bjorn3 commented Oct 8, 2021

It generates the same code. Reverted the inlining of Handler::null.

@rust-log-analyzer

This comment has been minimized.

@JohnCSimon JohnCSimon added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Oct 24, 2021
@joshtriplett
Copy link
Member

@bors r+

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Oct 30, 2021

📌 Commit 0cc4cce has been approved by joshtriplett

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Oct 30, 2021
bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Oct 31, 2021
…askrgr

Rollup of 4 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - rust-lang#89068 (Restructure std::rt (part 2))
 - rust-lang#89786 (Add #[must_use] to len and is_empty)
 - rust-lang#90430 (Add #[must_use] to remaining std functions (A-N))
 - rust-lang#90431 (Add #[must_use] to remaining std functions (O-Z))

Failed merges:

r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
@bors bors merged commit 6c5aa76 into rust-lang:master Oct 31, 2021
@rustbot rustbot added this to the 1.58.0 milestone Oct 31, 2021
@bjorn3 bjorn3 deleted the restructure_rt2 branch October 31, 2021 15:48
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
C-cleanup Category: PRs that clean code up or issues documenting cleanup. S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. T-libs-api Relevant to the library API team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

8 participants