Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Stabilize slice::strip_prefix and slice::strip_suffix #77853

Merged
merged 5 commits into from
Jan 7, 2021
Merged
Show file tree
Hide file tree
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension

Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
50 changes: 44 additions & 6 deletions library/core/src/slice/mod.rs
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -1778,19 +1778,24 @@ impl<T> [T] {
/// # Examples
///
/// ```
/// #![feature(slice_strip)]
/// let v = &[10, 40, 30];
/// assert_eq!(v.strip_prefix(&[10]), Some(&[40, 30][..]));
/// assert_eq!(v.strip_prefix(&[10, 40]), Some(&[30][..]));
/// assert_eq!(v.strip_prefix(&[50]), None);
/// assert_eq!(v.strip_prefix(&[10, 50]), None);
///
/// let prefix : &str = "he";
/// assert_eq!(b"hello".strip_prefix(prefix.as_bytes()),
/// Some(b"llo".as_ref()));
/// ```
#[must_use = "returns the subslice without modifying the original"]
#[unstable(feature = "slice_strip", issue = "73413")]
pub fn strip_prefix(&self, prefix: &[T]) -> Option<&[T]>
#[stable(feature = "slice_strip", since = "1.50.0")]
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This should be 1.51 right ?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Err, perhaps. I have just tried looking for git tags or something to tell me which Rust versions contain 8f0b945, the relevant commit, but there don't seem to be any tags for beta versions. I guess that makes sense. I found that origin/beta does not contain that commit, and the forge tells me beta is 1.50. So should I send a MR to fix this ?

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This PR is on 1.51.0 milestone according to rustbot.
Yes, someone could send another PR to update the stabilization version.

pub fn strip_prefix<P: SlicePattern<Item = T> + ?Sized>(&self, prefix: &P) -> Option<&[T]>
where
T: PartialEq,
{
// This function will need rewriting if and when SlicePattern becomes more sophisticated.
let prefix = prefix.as_slice();
let n = prefix.len();
if n <= self.len() {
let (head, tail) = self.split_at(n);
Expand All @@ -1811,19 +1816,20 @@ impl<T> [T] {
/// # Examples
///
/// ```
/// #![feature(slice_strip)]
/// let v = &[10, 40, 30];
/// assert_eq!(v.strip_suffix(&[30]), Some(&[10, 40][..]));
/// assert_eq!(v.strip_suffix(&[40, 30]), Some(&[10][..]));
/// assert_eq!(v.strip_suffix(&[50]), None);
/// assert_eq!(v.strip_suffix(&[50, 30]), None);
/// ```
#[must_use = "returns the subslice without modifying the original"]
#[unstable(feature = "slice_strip", issue = "73413")]
pub fn strip_suffix(&self, suffix: &[T]) -> Option<&[T]>
#[stable(feature = "slice_strip", since = "1.50.0")]
pub fn strip_suffix<P: SlicePattern<Item = T> + ?Sized>(&self, suffix: &P) -> Option<&[T]>
where
T: PartialEq,
{
// This function will need rewriting if and when SlicePattern becomes more sophisticated.
let suffix = suffix.as_slice();
let (len, n) = (self.len(), suffix.len());
if n <= len {
let (head, tail) = self.split_at(len - n);
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -3216,3 +3222,35 @@ impl<T> Default for &mut [T] {
&mut []
}
}

#[unstable(feature = "slice_pattern", reason = "stopgap trait for slice patterns", issue = "56345")]
/// Patterns in slices - currently, only used by `strip_prefix` and `strip_suffix`. At a future
/// point, we hope to generalise `core::str::Pattern` (which at the time of writing is limited to
/// `str`) to slices, and then this trait will be replaced or abolished.
pub trait SlicePattern {
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Should we seal this trait?

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I don't think it is necessary right now since the trait is still unstable.

/// The element type of the slice being matched on.
type Item;

/// Currently, the consumers of `SlicePattern` need a slice.
fn as_slice(&self) -> &[Self::Item];
}

#[stable(feature = "slice_strip", since = "1.50.0")]
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Stability attributes don't work on trait impls, I think you can just remove them.

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

impl<T> SlicePattern for [T] {
type Item = T;

#[inline]
fn as_slice(&self) -> &[Self::Item] {
self
}
}

#[stable(feature = "slice_strip", since = "1.50.0")]
impl<T, const N: usize> SlicePattern for [T; N] {
type Item = T;

#[inline]
fn as_slice(&self) -> &[Self::Item] {
self
}
}
1 change: 0 additions & 1 deletion library/std/src/lib.rs
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -307,7 +307,6 @@
#![feature(slice_internals)]
#![feature(slice_ptr_get)]
#![feature(slice_ptr_len)]
#![feature(slice_strip)]
#![feature(staged_api)]
#![feature(std_internals)]
#![feature(stdsimd)]
Expand Down