Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Suggest appropriate syntax on missing lifetime specifier in return type #55173

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Oct 25, 2018
Merged

Suggest appropriate syntax on missing lifetime specifier in return type #55173

merged 3 commits into from
Oct 25, 2018

Commits on Oct 22, 2018

  1. Suggest appropriate syntax on missing lifetime specifier in return type 

    Suggest using `'static` when a lifetime is missing in the return type
with a structured suggestion instead of a note.
    @estebank
    estebank committed Oct 22, 2018
    Configuration menu
    Copy the full SHA
    e1e52eb View commit details
    Browse the repository at this point in the history

  2. review comments

    @estebank
    estebank committed Oct 22, 2018
    Configuration menu
    Copy the full SHA
    d0bd69a View commit details
    Browse the repository at this point in the history

  3. [review comments] modify test and clean up code 

    Co-Authored-By: estebank <[email protected]>
    @oli-obk @estebank
    oli-obk and estebank committed Oct 22, 2018
    Configuration menu
    Copy the full SHA
    dd91c8f View commit details
    Browse the repository at this point in the history