Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

save-analysis: get tables directly, accomodating them being missing #39285

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 28, 2017

Conversation

nrc
Copy link
Member

@nrc nrc commented Jan 25, 2017

Fixes an ICE when running with save-analysis after an error

r? @eddyb

@eddyb
Copy link
Member

eddyb commented Jan 25, 2017

@bors r+

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Jan 25, 2017

📌 Commit 6d2fc9c has been approved by eddyb

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Jan 25, 2017

⌛ Testing commit 6d2fc9c with merge 3f5da5b...

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Jan 25, 2017

💔 Test failed - status-travis

@alexcrichton
Copy link
Member

alexcrichton commented Jan 25, 2017 via email

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Jan 26, 2017

☔ The latest upstream changes (presumably #39309) made this pull request unmergeable. Please resolve the merge conflicts.

Fixes an ICE when running with save-analsysis after an error
@nrc
Copy link
Member Author

nrc commented Jan 26, 2017

@bors: r=@eddyb

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Jan 26, 2017

📌 Commit 36ad34d has been approved by @eddyb

alexcrichton added a commit to alexcrichton/rust that referenced this pull request Jan 28, 2017
save-analysis: get tables directly, accomodating them being missing

Fixes an ICE when running with save-analysis after an error

r? @eddyb
bors added a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 28, 2017
@bors bors merged commit 36ad34d into rust-lang:master Jan 28, 2017
@eddyb eddyb mentioned this pull request Apr 18, 2017
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants