-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 12.8k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
rustdoc: use btree map for where clauses #33373
Merged
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
to get more reproducible output. Fixes: rust-lang#32555
(rust_highfive has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override) |
@bors r+ thanks! love rustdoc fixes |
📌 Commit 421e6fc has been approved by |
Manishearth
added a commit
to Manishearth/rust
that referenced
this pull request
May 8, 2016
rustdoc: use btree map for where clauses to get more reproducible output. Fixes: rust-lang#32555 I've looked at the other uses of HashMap in rustdoc, and they seem ok to (i.e. they use `iter()` and related only for constructing a new map, or when the output goes into independent files). Not sure what the cause of rust-lang#24473 is, it shouldn't be where clauses, but maybe it was also fixed inbetween since May 2015.
bors
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
May 8, 2016
⌛ Testing commit 421e6fc with merge 161f87d... |
💔 Test failed - auto-linux-64-opt-rustbuild |
Manishearth
added a commit
to Manishearth/rust
that referenced
this pull request
May 8, 2016
rustdoc: use btree map for where clauses to get more reproducible output. Fixes: rust-lang#32555 I've looked at the other uses of HashMap in rustdoc, and they seem ok to (i.e. they use `iter()` and related only for constructing a new map, or when the output goes into independent files). Not sure what the cause of rust-lang#24473 is, it shouldn't be where clauses, but maybe it was also fixed inbetween since May 2015.
bors
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
May 8, 2016
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
to get more reproducible output.
Fixes: #32555
I've looked at the other uses of HashMap in rustdoc, and they seem ok to (i.e. they use
iter()
and related only for constructing a new map, or when the output goes into independent files).Not sure what the cause of #24473 is, it shouldn't be where clauses, but maybe it was also fixed inbetween since May 2015.