Remove negate_unsigned feature gate

[oli-obk]

fixes #29645

[rust-highfive]

Thanks for the pull request, and welcome! The Rust team is excited to review your changes, and you should hear from @alexcrichton (or someone else) soon.

If any changes to this PR are deemed necessary, please add them as extra commits. This ensures that the reviewer can see what has changed since they last reviewed the code. Due to the way GitHub handles out-of-date commits, this should also make it reasonably obvious what issues have or haven't been addressed. Large or tricky changes may require several passes of review and changes.

Please see the contribution instructions for more information.

[alexcrichton]

Thanks! Could you also squash the commits down into one?

[hanna-kruppe]

This will break nightly programs that use the negate_unsigned feature, right? If so, please throw a [breaking-change] in the PR description or in one of the commit messages.

[oli-obk]

squashed, added [breaking-change] and rewrote the help message

[ollie27]

I think the help message should mention .wrapping_neg() because it matches the behaviour of the current unsigned negation and can't overflow.

[pnkfelix]

@ollie27 I am not sure if wrapping_neg is a const fn, so such a message could be misleading in a const expression context. .. still there might be a way to phrase the suggestion (or only emit it in non const contexts? )

[pnkfelix]

The Travis failures look legitimate

[oli-obk]

fixed tidy errors and adjusted the second test's help messages

[emberian]

(Statement retracted, nuke it from orbit)

[pnkfelix]

@bors r+ cb0858b

[pnkfelix]

@bors rollup

[bors]

⌛ Testing commit cb0858b with merge 38683b9...

[bors]

💔 Test failed - auto-linux-64-nopt-t

[steveklabnik]

@bors: r-

this failed the rollup

[pnkfelix]

@oli-obk looks like it needs to be updated to use the new structured error API for the span_note call?

[oli-obk]

rebased and fixed

[pnkfelix]

@bors r+ bac3eec rollup