-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 12.8k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
only store valid proc macro item for doc link #133105
Conversation
How does this gets to an ICE? |
During the compilation of a proc macro crate, the However, when building the docs for current crate, it attempts to use the information
Following these principles, removing the check |
9c4007c
to
961ec90
Compare
UPDATE: now it will only store the valid proc macro item |
961ec90
to
30d68eb
Compare
@rustbot ready |
Thanks! |
Rollup of 6 pull requests Successful merges: - rust-lang#132730 (std: allow after-main use of synchronization primitives) - rust-lang#133105 (only store valid proc macro item for doc link) - rust-lang#133260 (Constify the `Deref`/`DerefMut` traits, too) - rust-lang#133297 (Remove legacy bitcode for iOS) - rust-lang#133298 (Mention that std::fs::remove_dir_all fails on files) - rust-lang#133384 (add a test for target-feature-ABI warnings in closures and when calling extern fn) r? `@ghost` `@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
Rollup merge of rust-lang#133105 - bvanjoi:issue-132743, r=petrochenkov only store valid proc macro item for doc link Fixes rust-lang#132743 The definition item can be detected if it is exported in the doc, so store these items rather than skipping. r? `@petrochenkov`
Fixes #132743
The definition item can be detected if it is exported in the doc, so store these items rather than skipping.
r? @petrochenkov