Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Report the note when specified in diagnostic::on_unimplemented #130123

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Sep 11, 2024

Conversation

FedericoBruzzone
Copy link
Contributor

@FedericoBruzzone FedericoBruzzone commented Sep 8, 2024

Before this PR the note field was completely ignored for some reason, now it is shown (I think) correctly during the hir typechecking phase.

  1. Report the note when specified in diagnostic::on_unimplemented
  2. Added a test for unimplemented trait diagnostic
  3. Added a test for custom unimplemented trait diagnostic

Close #130084

P.S. This is my first PR to rustc.

@rustbot
Copy link
Collaborator

rustbot commented Sep 8, 2024

Thanks for the pull request, and welcome! The Rust team is excited to review your changes, and you should hear from @Nadrieril (or someone else) some time within the next two weeks.

Please see the contribution instructions for more information. Namely, in order to ensure the minimum review times lag, PR authors and assigned reviewers should ensure that the review label (S-waiting-on-review and S-waiting-on-author) stays updated, invoking these commands when appropriate:

  • @rustbot author: the review is finished, PR author should check the comments and take action accordingly
  • @rustbot review: the author is ready for a review, this PR will be queued again in the reviewer's queue

@rustbot rustbot added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. S-waiting-on-author Status: This is awaiting some action (such as code changes or more information) from the author. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Sep 8, 2024
@rust-log-analyzer

This comment has been minimized.

@@ -0,0 +1,15 @@
pub trait ProviderLt {}
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This test doesn't really exercise anything. Could you please delete it?

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

ping :)

compiler/rustc_hir_typeck/src/method/suggest.rs Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
struct B;

fn main() {
B.request(); //~ ERROR 15:7: 15:14: my message [E0599]
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change
B.request(); //~ ERROR 15:7: 15:14: my message [E0599]
B.request();
//~^ ERROR my message
//~| LABEL my label
//~| NOTE my note

@@ -1363,6 +1363,11 @@ impl<'a, 'tcx> FnCtxt<'a, 'tcx> {
"the following trait bounds were not satisfied:\n{bound_list}"
));
}
for note in notes {
debug!("FCB {}", note);
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

FCB? can you remove?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I beg your pardon, I had forgotten :'D

Comment on lines 14 to 19
fn main() {
B.request();
}
//~^^ my message [E0599]
//~| my label
//~| my note
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change
fn main() {
B.request();
}
//~^^ my message [E0599]
//~| my label
//~| my note
fn main() {
B.request();
//~^ my message
//~| my label
//~| my note
}

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thank you. This is my first contribution, from the next I will learn best practices.

@FedericoBruzzone
Copy link
Contributor Author

@compiler-errors Thank you for your review.

It should be okay now, let me know

@compiler-errors
Copy link
Member

You still didn't delete the test file I asked to be deleted

@FedericoBruzzone
Copy link
Contributor Author

You still didn't delete the test file I asked to be deleted

I had deleted an incorrect file

@compiler-errors
Copy link
Member

@bors r+ rollup

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Sep 10, 2024

📌 Commit 4cecf42 has been approved by compiler-errors

It is now in the queue for this repository.

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-author Status: This is awaiting some action (such as code changes or more information) from the author. labels Sep 10, 2024
workingjubilee added a commit to workingjubilee/rustc that referenced this pull request Sep 11, 2024
…r-errors

Report the `note` when specified in `diagnostic::on_unimplemented`

Before this PR the `note` field was completely ignored for some reason, now it is shown (I think) correctly during the hir typechecking phase.

1. Report the `note` when specified in `diagnostic::on_unimplemented`
2. Added a test for unimplemented trait diagnostic
3. Added a test for custom unimplemented trait diagnostic

Close rust-lang#130084

P.S. This is my first PR to rustc.
bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Sep 11, 2024
…kingjubilee

Rollup of 14 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - rust-lang#129260 (Don't suggest adding return type for closures with default return type)
 - rust-lang#129520 (Suggest the correct pattern syntax on usage of unit variant pattern for a struct variant)
 - rust-lang#129696 (update stdarch)
 - rust-lang#129759 (Stabilize `const_refs_to_static`)
 - rust-lang#129835 (enable const-float-classify test, and test_next_up/down on 32bit x86)
 - rust-lang#129866 (Clarify documentation labelling and definitions for std::collections)
 - rust-lang#130052 (Don't leave debug locations for constants sitting on the builder indefinitely)
 - rust-lang#130077 (Fix linking error when compiling for 32-bit watchOS)
 - rust-lang#130123 (Report the `note` when specified in `diagnostic::on_unimplemented`)
 - rust-lang#130156 (Add test for S_OBJNAME & update test for LF_BUILDINFO cl and cmd)
 - rust-lang#130206 (Map `WSAEDQUOT` to `ErrorKind::FilesystemQuotaExceeded`)
 - rust-lang#130207 (Map `ERROR_CANT_RESOLVE_FILENAME` to `ErrorKind::FilesystemLoop`)
 - rust-lang#130219 (Fix false positive with `missing_docs` and `#[test]`)
 - rust-lang#130221 (Make SearchPath::new public)

r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Sep 11, 2024
…iaskrgr

Rollup of 9 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - rust-lang#129260 (Don't suggest adding return type for closures with default return type)
 - rust-lang#129520 (Suggest the correct pattern syntax on usage of unit variant pattern for a struct variant)
 - rust-lang#129866 (Clarify documentation labelling and definitions for std::collections)
 - rust-lang#130123 (Report the `note` when specified in `diagnostic::on_unimplemented`)
 - rust-lang#130161 (refactor merge base logic and fix `x fmt`)
 - rust-lang#130206 (Map `WSAEDQUOT` to `ErrorKind::FilesystemQuotaExceeded`)
 - rust-lang#130207 (Map `ERROR_CANT_RESOLVE_FILENAME` to `ErrorKind::FilesystemLoop`)
 - rust-lang#130219 (Fix false positive with `missing_docs` and `#[test]`)
 - rust-lang#130221 (Make SearchPath::new public)

r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
@bors bors merged commit 5107ff4 into rust-lang:master Sep 11, 2024
6 checks passed
@rustbot rustbot added this to the 1.83.0 milestone Sep 11, 2024
rust-timer added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Sep 11, 2024
Rollup merge of rust-lang#130123 - FedericoBruzzone:master, r=compiler-errors

Report the `note` when specified in `diagnostic::on_unimplemented`

Before this PR the `note` field was completely ignored for some reason, now it is shown (I think) correctly during the hir typechecking phase.

1. Report the `note` when specified in `diagnostic::on_unimplemented`
2. Added a test for unimplemented trait diagnostic
3. Added a test for custom unimplemented trait diagnostic

Close rust-lang#130084

P.S. This is my first PR to rustc.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

diagnostic::on_unimplemented notes not displayed
6 participants