-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 12.8k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
coverage: CoverageIdsInfo::mcdc_bitmap_bytes
is never needed
#125108
Merged
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This code for recalculating `mcdc_bitmap_bytes` doesn't provide any benefit, because its result won't have changed from the value in `FunctionCoverageInfo` that was computed during the MIR instrumentation pass.
These comments appear to be inspired by the similar comments on `CounterIncrement` and `ExpressionUsed`. But those comments refer to specific simplification steps performed during coverage codegen, and there is no corresponding step for the MC/DC coverage statements. If these statements do not survive optimization, they will simply not participate in code generation, just like any other statement.
r? @nnethercote rustbot has assigned @nnethercote. Use |
rustbot
added
the
S-waiting-on-review
Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties.
label
May 14, 2024
Some changes occurred to MIR optimizations cc @rust-lang/wg-mir-opt |
rustbot
added
T-compiler
Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
A-code-coverage
Area: Source-based code coverage (-Cinstrument-coverage)
labels
May 14, 2024
I don't understand the coverage stuff at all, but these small changes seem fine and are well explained in the commit logs. @bors r+ |
bors
added
S-waiting-on-bors
Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion.
and removed
S-waiting-on-review
Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties.
labels
May 14, 2024
bors
added a commit
to rust-lang-ci/rust
that referenced
this pull request
May 15, 2024
…iaskrgr Rollup of 4 pull requests Successful merges: - rust-lang#124990 (Also expand weak alias tys inside consts inside `expand_weak_alias_tys`) - rust-lang#125108 (coverage: `CoverageIdsInfo::mcdc_bitmap_bytes` is never needed) - rust-lang#125132 (Add `on_unimplemented" typo suggestions) - rust-lang#125135 (Fix the dedup error because of spans from suggestion) r? `@ghost` `@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
rust-timer
added a commit
to rust-lang-ci/rust
that referenced
this pull request
May 15, 2024
Rollup merge of rust-lang#125108 - Zalathar:info-bitmap-bytes, r=nnethercote coverage: `CoverageIdsInfo::mcdc_bitmap_bytes` is never needed This code for recalculating `mcdc_bitmap_bytes` in a query doesn't provide any benefit, because its result won't have changed from the value in `FunctionCoverageInfo` that was computed during the MIR instrumentation pass. Extracted from rust-lang#124571, to avoid having this held up by unrelated issues with condition count checks. `@rustbot` label +A-code-coverage
matthiaskrgr
added a commit
to matthiaskrgr/rust
that referenced
this pull request
May 30, 2024
coverage: Rename MC/DC `conditions_num` to `num_conditions` Updated version of rust-lang#124571, without the other changes that were split out into rust-lang#125108 and rust-lang#125700. This value represents a quantity of conditions, not an ID, so the new spelling is more appropriate. Some of the code touched by this PR could perhaps use some other changes, but I would prefer to keep this PR as a simple renaming and avoid scope creep. `@rustbot` label +A-code-coverage
rust-timer
added a commit
to rust-lang-ci/rust
that referenced
this pull request
May 30, 2024
Rollup merge of rust-lang#125754 - Zalathar:conditions-num, r=lqd coverage: Rename MC/DC `conditions_num` to `num_conditions` Updated version of rust-lang#124571, without the other changes that were split out into rust-lang#125108 and rust-lang#125700. This value represents a quantity of conditions, not an ID, so the new spelling is more appropriate. Some of the code touched by this PR could perhaps use some other changes, but I would prefer to keep this PR as a simple renaming and avoid scope creep. `@rustbot` label +A-code-coverage
celinval
added a commit
to celinval/rust-dev
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 4, 2024
Update Rust toolchain from nightly-2024-05-15 to nightly-2024-05-16 without any other source changes. This is an automatically generated pull request. If any of the CI checks fail, manual intervention is required. In such a case, review the changes at https://github.com/rust-lang/rust from rust-lang@8387315 up to rust-lang@1871252. The log for this commit range is: rust-lang@1871252fc8 Auto merge of rust-lang#125164 - fmease:rollup-s5vwzlg, r=fmease rust-lang@734a109998 Rollup merge of rust-lang#125159 - fmease:allow-unauth-labels-l-pg-z, r=jieyouxu rust-lang@601e5d199f Rollup merge of rust-lang#125154 - FractalFir:fnabi_doc, r=compiler-errors rust-lang@09156291e5 Rollup merge of rust-lang#125146 - Oneirical:panic-impl, r=jieyouxu rust-lang@80f991e09b Rollup merge of rust-lang#125142 - GuillaumeGomez:migrate-rustdoc-themes, r=jieyouxu rust-lang@c5b17ec9d2 Rollup merge of rust-lang#125003 - RalfJung:aligned_alloc, r=cuviper rust-lang@257d222e4b Improved the documentation of the FnAbi struct rust-lang@72a48fc68c Allow unauthenticated users to modify `L-*`, `PG-*` and `-Z*` labels rust-lang@b21b74b5e6 Auto merge of rust-lang#125134 - compiler-errors:negative-traits-are-not-notable, r=fmease rust-lang@a7484d2e49 fix tidy rust-lang@cae17ff42b rewrite panic-impl-transitive rust-lang@ade234d574 Auto merge of rust-lang#125144 - fmease:rollup-4uft293, r=fmease rust-lang@8d38f2fb11 Rollup merge of rust-lang#125137 - RalfJung:mir-sh, r=scottmcm rust-lang@2659ff3882 Rollup merge of rust-lang#125104 - Oneirical:test6, r=jieyouxu rust-lang@4f7d9d4ad8 Rollup merge of rust-lang#125038 - ivan-shrimp:checked_sub, r=joboet rust-lang@2804d4223b Rollup merge of rust-lang#125027 - Oneirical:c-test-with-remove, r=jieyouxu rust-lang@2e70bea168 Rollup merge of rust-lang#124975 - lu-zero:move_file, r=clubby789 rust-lang@3873a74f8a Rollup merge of rust-lang#124307 - reitermarkus:escape-debug-size-hint-inline, r=joboet rust-lang@3cb0030fe9 Auto merge of rust-lang#123413 - petrochenkov:delegmulti2, r=fmease rust-lang@c765480efe Migrate `run-make/rustdoc-themes` to new rmake rust-lang@c87ae947eb Add new `htmldocck` function to `run-make-support` rust-lang@a71c3ffce9 Auto merge of rust-lang#125032 - compiler-errors:crash-dump-dir, r=onur-ozkan rust-lang@0afd50e852 MIR operators: clarify Shl/Shr handling of negative offsets rust-lang@44fa5fd39a Auto merge of rust-lang#125136 - matthiaskrgr:rollup-ljm15m3, r=matthiaskrgr rust-lang@5f1a120ee5 Rollup merge of rust-lang#125135 - chenyukang:yukang-fix-116502, r=compiler-errors rust-lang@f7c2934420 Rollup merge of rust-lang#125132 - mejrs:diag, r=compiler-errors rust-lang@a8ff937b07 Rollup merge of rust-lang#125108 - Zalathar:info-bitmap-bytes, r=nnethercote rust-lang@03ff673dcc Rollup merge of rust-lang#124990 - fmease:expand-weak-aliases-within-cts, r=compiler-errors rust-lang@75895f59b0 Fix the dedup error because of spans from suggestion rust-lang@9e7aff7945 Auto merge of rust-lang#125031 - Oneirical:dynamic-libs, r=jieyouxu rust-lang@8994840f7e rustdoc: Negative impls are not notable rust-lang@91a3f04a3f fix the test rust-lang@0160bff4b1 Auto merge of rust-lang#125084 - Jules-Bertholet:fix-125058, r=Nadrieril rust-lang@c30b41012d delegation: Implement list delegation rust-lang@18d7411719 Add `on_unimplemented" typo suggestions rust-lang@81f7e54962 Port issue-11908 to rmake rust-lang@1f61cc3078 port no-cdylib-as-rdylib test rust-lang@b1e5e5161a remove cxx_flags rust-lang@1f5837ae25 rewrite c-link-to-rust-staticlib rust-lang@5cc020d3df avoid using aligned_alloc; posix_memalign is better-behaved rust-lang@c81be68fb4 coverage: Remove confusing comments from `CoverageKind` rust-lang@bfadc3a9b9 coverage: `CoverageIdsInfo::mcdc_bitmap_bytes` is never needed rust-lang@fe8f66e4bc `rustc_hir_typeck`: Account for `skipped_ref_pats` in `expr_use_visitor` rust-lang@4db00fe229 Use an helper to move the files rust-lang@7fde7308bf reverse condition in `uN::checked_sub` rust-lang@848f3c2c6e Make crashes dump mir to build dir rust-lang@35a5be2833 Also expand weak alias tys inside consts inside `expand_weak_alias_tys` rust-lang@4edf12d33e Improve escape methods. rust-lang@16981ba406 Avoid panicking branch in `EscapeIterInner`. rust-lang@e3fc97be2b Inline `EscapeDebug::size_hint`. Co-authored-by: celinval <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Zyad Hassan <[email protected]>
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Labels
A-code-coverage
Area: Source-based code coverage (-Cinstrument-coverage)
S-waiting-on-bors
Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion.
T-compiler
Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This code for recalculating
mcdc_bitmap_bytes
in a query doesn't provide any benefit, because its result won't have changed from the value inFunctionCoverageInfo
that was computed during the MIR instrumentation pass.Extracted from #124571, to avoid having this held up by unrelated issues with condition count checks.
@rustbot label +A-code-coverage