deps: update cpufeatures, swap difference to dissimilar

[klensy]

Updating cpufeatures v0.2.1 -> v0.2.5: https://github.com/RustCrypto/utils/blob/master/cpufeatures/CHANGELOG.md#025-2022-09-04, was yanked bc of miscompile (RustCrypto/utils#800, #101346)

Removing difference v2.0.0
Adding dissimilar v1.0.4
Updating expect-test v1.0.1 -> v1.4.0

difference unmaintened https://rustsec.org/advisories/RUSTSEC-2020-0095.html, so replaced with https://github.com/dtolnay/dissimilar (as dependency of expect-test)

[rustbot]

r? @Mark-Simulacrum

(rustbot has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override)

[klensy]

tidy error: invalid license `Apache-2.0` in `dissimilar 1.0.4 should this be added to exceptions list in tidy, or fixed in crate as dual mit/apache license (as noted in readme https://github.com/dtolnay/dissimilar/blob/master/README.md#license)?

[Mark-Simulacrum]

dissimilar is only available under Apache 2.0; new contributions to it and anything unique to that repository are MIT or Apache 2.0 licensed, but that's not sufficient to make use of it under just MIT terms.

I think the best bet is going to be adding it to the exceptions list, we have other Apache 2.0-only libraries there so that seems fine to me.

[klensy]

@rustbot ready

added exception and updated required versions of expect-test in Cargo.toml's

[Mark-Simulacrum]

@bors r+ rollup=iffy

[bors]

📌 Commit ceee880 has been approved by Mark-Simulacrum

It is now in the queue for this repository.

[bors]

⌛ Testing commit ceee880 with merge e72ea1d...

[bors]

☀️ Test successful - checks-actions
Approved by: Mark-Simulacrum
Pushing e72ea1d to master...

[rust-timer]

Finished benchmarking commit (e72ea1d): comparison URL.

Overall result: ❌✅ regressions and improvements - no action needed

@rustbot label: -perf-regression

Instruction count

This is a highly reliable metric that was used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

	mean	range	count
Regressions ❌ (primary)	-	-	0
Regressions ❌ (secondary)	1.7%	[1.7%, 1.7%]	1
Improvements ✅ (primary)	-	-	0
Improvements ✅ (secondary)	-0.2%	[-0.2%, -0.2%]	1
All ❌✅ (primary)	-	-	0

Max RSS (memory usage)

Results

This is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

	mean	range	count
Regressions ❌ (primary)	-	-	0
Regressions ❌ (secondary)	5.3%	[5.3%, 5.3%]	1
Improvements ✅ (primary)	-2.1%	[-3.5%, -0.9%]	4
Improvements ✅ (secondary)	-	-	0
All ❌✅ (primary)	-2.1%	[-3.5%, -0.9%]	4

Cycles

Results

This is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

	mean	range	count
Regressions ❌ (primary)	-	-	0
Regressions ❌ (secondary)	2.3%	[2.2%, 2.3%]	4
Improvements ✅ (primary)	-	-	0
Improvements ✅ (secondary)	-	-	0
All ❌✅ (primary)	-	-	0