Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Trying to suggest additional lifetime parameter #102323

Merged
merged 6 commits into from
Oct 10, 2022
Merged

Trying to suggest additional lifetime parameter #102323

Show file tree
Hide file tree
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
6 commits
Select commit Hold shift + click to select a range
887515a
Trying to suggest additional lifetime parameter
Stoozy Sep 26, 2022
365457b
Using multipart suggestion
Stoozy Sep 27, 2022
24c8e27
Properly formatting the multipart suggestion
Stoozy Sep 27, 2022
e7cb6ad
Proper span for new generic param suggestion
Stoozy Sep 28, 2022
ef930a2
Emitting error regardless of new param suggestion
Stoozy Sep 29, 2022
2657f9d
Removed unnecessary for loop
Stoozy Oct 1, 2022
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
33 changes: 31 additions & 2 deletions compiler/rustc_resolve/src/late/lifetimes.rs
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -1318,12 +1318,41 @@ impl<'a, 'tcx> LifetimeContext<'a, 'tcx> {
&& let hir::IsAsync::NotAsync = self.tcx.asyncness(lifetime_ref.hir_id.owner.def_id)
&& !self.tcx.features().anonymous_lifetime_in_impl_trait
{
rustc_session::parse::feature_err(
let mut diag = rustc_session::parse::feature_err(
&self.tcx.sess.parse_sess,
sym::anonymous_lifetime_in_impl_trait,
lifetime_ref.span,
"anonymous lifetimes in `impl Trait` are unstable",
).emit();
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

You can keep this a feature error. You can keep this line, but instead of calling emit immediately, store it in a mut variable diag, decorate it using span_... methods, and call emit when you're done.

);

match self.tcx.hir().get_generics(lifetime_ref.hir_id.owner.def_id) {
Some(generics) => {
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Now you have generics you want 2 things to know where to suggest the lifetime parameter param_span, and in what form param_sugg.
Once you have that, you call

diag.multipart_suggestion(
  "consider introducing a named lifetime parameter",
  vec![
    (lifetime_ref.span, "'a".to_owned()), // this is at the use site
    (param_span, param_sugg), // this is in generics
  ],
)

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

it seems if I put "'a" for the message, it replaces the ampersand symbol from the original posters input. Should I keep this?

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

You can use lifetime_ref.span.shrink_to_hi() instead then.


let new_param_sugg_tuple;

new_param_sugg_tuple = match generics.span_for_param_suggestion() {
Some(_) => {
Some((self.tcx.sess.source_map().span_through_char(generics.span, '<').shrink_to_hi(), "'a, ".to_owned()))
},
None => Some((generics.span, "<'a>".to_owned()))
};

let mut multi_sugg_vec = vec![(lifetime_ref.span.shrink_to_hi(), "'a ".to_owned())];

if let Some(new_tuple) = new_param_sugg_tuple{
multi_sugg_vec.push(new_tuple);
}
cjgillot marked this conversation as resolved.
Show resolved Hide resolved

diag.span_label(lifetime_ref.span, "expected named lifetime parameter");
diag.multipart_suggestion("consider introducing a named lifetime parameter",
multi_sugg_vec,
rustc_errors::Applicability::MaybeIncorrect);

},
None => { }
}

diag.emit();
return;
}
scope = s;
Expand Down
12 changes: 10 additions & 2 deletions src/test/ui/suggestions/impl-trait-missing-lifetime-gated.stderr
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -26,17 +26,25 @@ error[E0658]: anonymous lifetimes in `impl Trait` are unstable
--> $DIR/impl-trait-missing-lifetime-gated.rs:5:31
|
LL | fn f(_: impl Iterator<Item = &'_ ()>) {}
| ^^
| ^^ expected named lifetime parameter
|
= help: add `#![feature(anonymous_lifetime_in_impl_trait)]` to the crate attributes to enable
help: consider introducing a named lifetime parameter
|
LL | fn f<'a>(_: impl Iterator<Item = &'_'a ()>) {}
| ++++ ++

error[E0658]: anonymous lifetimes in `impl Trait` are unstable
--> $DIR/impl-trait-missing-lifetime-gated.rs:8:31
|
LL | fn g(x: impl Iterator<Item = &'_ ()>) -> Option<&'_ ()> { x.next() }
| ^^
| ^^ expected named lifetime parameter
|
= help: add `#![feature(anonymous_lifetime_in_impl_trait)]` to the crate attributes to enable
help: consider introducing a named lifetime parameter
|
LL | fn g<'a>(x: impl Iterator<Item = &'_'a ()>) -> Option<&'_ ()> { x.next() }
| ++++ ++
Comment on lines +44 to +47
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looking at the resulting code here, the .shrink_to_hi() of the span without checking whether the span covers only & or '_ causes invalid code to be produced. It also seems like we might also want to replace the anon lifetime in the return type?

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Replacing the anon lifetime in the return type seems like an outsized change. I'd rather stabilize this feature sooner, to get rid of the question.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Is there anything else I should do?

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The question is: do you want to take a bit more time in this PR to fix the '_'a situation?


error: aborting due to 4 previous errors

Expand Down