Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Rollup of 6 pull requests #101603

Merged
merged 15 commits into from
Sep 9, 2022
Merged

Rollup of 6 pull requests #101603

merged 15 commits into from
Sep 9, 2022

Conversation

matthiaskrgr
Copy link
Member

Successful merges:

Failed merges:

r? @ghost
@rustbot modify labels: rollup

Create a similar rollup

5225225 and others added 15 commits August 14, 2022 10:37
	modified:   compiler/rustc_typeck/src/check/intrinsicck.rs
	modified:   src/test/ui/asm/bad-template.aarch64_mirunsafeck.stderr
	modified:   src/test/ui/asm/bad-template.aarch64_thirunsafeck.stderr
	modified:   src/test/ui/asm/bad-template.x86_64_mirunsafeck.stderr
	modified:   src/test/ui/asm/bad-template.x86_64_thirunsafeck.stderr
	modified:   src/test/ui/asm/type-check-1.rs
	modified:   src/test/ui/asm/type-check-1.stderr
	modified:   src/test/ui/asm/x86_64/type-check-3.stderr
fix the suggestion of format for asm_sub_register

	modified:   compiler/rustc_typeck/src/check/intrinsicck.rs
	modified:   src/test/ui/asm/bad-template.aarch64_mirunsafeck.stderr
	modified:   src/test/ui/asm/bad-template.aarch64_thirunsafeck.stderr
	modified:   src/test/ui/asm/bad-template.x86_64_mirunsafeck.stderr
	modified:   src/test/ui/asm/bad-template.x86_64_thirunsafeck.stderr
	modified:   src/test/ui/asm/type-check-1.rs
	modified:   src/test/ui/asm/type-check-1.stderr
	modified:   src/test/ui/asm/x86_64/type-check-3.stderr
…acrum

Add `const_extern_fn` to 1.62 release notes.

Adds rust-lang#95346 which did not get tagged with relnotes.

Closes rust-lang#101443
…int, r=jackh726

Tweak future opaque ty pretty printing

1. The `Return` type of a generator doesn't need to be a lang item just for diagnostic printing of types
2. We shouldn't suppress the `Output = Ty` of a opaque future if the type is a int or float var.
Link UEFI target documentation from target list

rust-lang#99760 added UEFI target documentation, but forgot to link it from the main target list.
…ip, r=notriddle

Cleanup themes (tooltip)

No changes in the UI. I used this opportunity to unify the dark theme with the others for the alpha parameter though.

r? `@notriddle`
@rustbot rustbot added T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. T-libs Relevant to the library team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. T-rustdoc Relevant to the rustdoc team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. rollup A PR which is a rollup labels Sep 9, 2022
@matthiaskrgr
Copy link
Member Author

@bors r+ rollup=never p=6

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Sep 9, 2022

📌 Commit 8b78fa0 has been approved by matthiaskrgr

It is now in the queue for this repository.

@bors bors added the S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. label Sep 9, 2022
@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Sep 9, 2022

⌛ Testing commit 8b78fa0 with merge 4a09adf...

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Sep 9, 2022

☀️ Test successful - checks-actions
Approved by: matthiaskrgr
Pushing 4a09adf to master...

@bors bors added the merged-by-bors This PR was explicitly merged by bors. label Sep 9, 2022
@bors bors merged commit 4a09adf into rust-lang:master Sep 9, 2022
@rustbot rustbot added this to the 1.65.0 milestone Sep 9, 2022
@rust-timer
Copy link
Collaborator

📌 Perf builds for each rolled up PR:

PR# Perf Build Sha
#101593 5c8d9ddfda0760c9768f41ca2e83ce153d389d03
#101563 f21572e05585ea367e5b71d685916012f76c7667
#101556 bc4d6e25299e7e04c5e96c6db4f83ae93f9011a7
#101450 a7785de6b5a292807b33193a58d35afae80294b1
#101253 4766786d68908241dc0841bd4260475f7aa88e94
#99207 df63a2fdc81994e4dd9b4643bdf6fac644d5645f

previous master: ab32548539

In the case of a perf regression, run the following command for each PR you suspect might be the cause: @rust-timer build $SHA

@rust-timer
Copy link
Collaborator

Finished benchmarking commit (4a09adf): comparison URL.

Overall result: ✅ improvements - no action needed

@rustbot label: -perf-regression

Instruction count

This is a highly reliable metric that was used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

mean1 range count2
Regressions ❌
(primary)
- - 0
Regressions ❌
(secondary)
- - 0
Improvements ✅
(primary)
-1.3% [-1.4%, -1.2%] 2
Improvements ✅
(secondary)
-3.3% [-3.8%, -2.8%] 7
All ❌✅ (primary) -1.3% [-1.4%, -1.2%] 2

Max RSS (memory usage)

Results

This is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

mean1 range count2
Regressions ❌
(primary)
- - 0
Regressions ❌
(secondary)
1.9% [1.9%, 1.9%] 1
Improvements ✅
(primary)
- - 0
Improvements ✅
(secondary)
-3.9% [-4.3%, -3.6%] 2
All ❌✅ (primary) - - 0

Cycles

Results

This is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

mean1 range count2
Regressions ❌
(primary)
- - 0
Regressions ❌
(secondary)
2.0% [1.9%, 2.1%] 2
Improvements ✅
(primary)
- - 0
Improvements ✅
(secondary)
-4.7% [-6.8%, -3.3%] 10
All ❌✅ (primary) - - 0

Footnotes

  1. the arithmetic mean of the percent change 2 3

  2. number of relevant changes 2 3

@matthiaskrgr matthiaskrgr deleted the rollup-8y6kf20 branch October 9, 2022 00:31
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
merged-by-bors This PR was explicitly merged by bors. rollup A PR which is a rollup S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. T-libs Relevant to the library team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. T-rustdoc Relevant to the rustdoc team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

9 participants