-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 12.8k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
CI: automatically approve a PR if has auto-approve
label
#100876
Conversation
(rust-highfive has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override) |
I would like to see some kind of discussion on why we're interested in this feature / what the goal is. In general, it seems like the wrong place to put it -- if we want bors to wait for PR CI to pass before respecting r+, then adjusting bors seems like a better plan (e.g., rust-lang/homu#67, rust-lang/homu#120). As-is, I don't think this would work, since the user GitHub uses isn't trusted by bors. Further, it would mean that "write" permissions on this repository are enough to merge PRs into master, which is also not what we want (I think today this is more murky in any case, I'm not sure the extent to which branch protections etc are enough here, but we don't want that to look benign via bors testing things). |
The job Click to see the possible cause of the failure (guessed by this bot)
|
Yes. That is what I wanted most when I opened this PR. I believe the problem is that when a commit is pushed or when a PR is opened, a reviewer sees that there are no problems and would like to approve the PR, but the CI is still pending. An example of an eager review is #100336 (comment) - where the PR is approved before CI ran and CI failed afterwards. On the other hand, not approving it adds more work for the reviewer as they would then need to go back to the PR again and approve if they see the green results. (sometimes there is more work if the reviewer forgot that they believed the PR was good, so they have to go back and review again)
Agreed. I only opened this PR because I am not familiar with homu's infrastructure. Thank you for pointing me to rust-lang/homu#120! cc @camelid, could we redirect the discussion to there instead? |
I'll go ahead and close this PR, but feel free to open a thread on #t-infra if you'd like to discuss solutions further. |
@fee1-dead I'd love for someone to pick that PR up again, but unfortunately I won't have time myself and I don't remember much of the context of the code. Let me know if you have questions about it though and I'll try to answer them. |
I have no idea if this would work. But given that a lot of people (including me) would like to have this feature, I took a stab.
The current design is placing a dedicated label on PRs such that, when CI has successfully ran, GitHub Actions will tell bors to r= the current assignee of the PR.