You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
This can be done with ref-counting, but to avoid using an actual Rc (e.g. to be able to do #9) and/or the GSS being more tightly coupled with the SPPF, I'd prefer to use an "unwinding" approach, where we propagate failure up the call-chain, and generate calls to decrement SPPF ref-counts on failure.
May interfere with #12, #13, #16 etc. by removing nodes that could be needed later.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
We don't have to do "unwinding" right away, we can recover the "stashed" left SPPF children node of a concatenation, from a Continuation (those are the only SPPF nodes kept around by GSS).
This can be done with ref-counting, but to avoid using an actual
Rc
(e.g. to be able to do #9) and/or the GSS being more tightly coupled with the SPPF, I'd prefer to use an "unwinding" approach, where we propagate failure up the call-chain, and generate calls to decrement SPPF ref-counts on failure.May interfere with #12, #13, #16 etc. by removing nodes that could be needed later.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: