swagger_doc.json returns wrong swagger doc urls

[orbanbotond]

See the description here:

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/25772229/swagger-doc-json-returns-wrong-swagger-doc-urls/25782328#25782328

It seems that since the version 0.7.2 the url_base get lost...

#0.7.2
:path => "#{url_base}/#{local_route}#{url_format}",

#0.8
path: "/#{local_route}#{url_format}",

[dblock]

I think this was done on purpose because there's a separate basePath returned and Swagger-UI combines those values. Do you set that globally? Does swagger UI render actually wrong URLs?

[orbanbotond]

I tried to set base_path without any effect... should I try basePath?

According to the doc it is base_path

[dblock]

The doc should be correct. It's possible that this is a bug of course, maybe you can try to build a simple repro case, I would start by looking at tests inside this gem, maybe add one.

[TrevTheDev]

+1 for me: in my case ignoring the base_path means that my two swagger endpoints no longer work.

[davidmccoy]

Same here. I can't get grape-swagger to pay attention to any base_path values.

[dblock]

I believe this may be fixed by https://github.com/tim-vandecasteele/grape-swagger/pull/167, can someone please do me a favor and verify it?

[tomafc330]

@dblock checked out latest from master d33fb9d and still didn't work. workaround for now is to revert back to 0.7.2

[dblock]

@tommytcchan Help me reproduce this in a spec in this project?

[boomshadow]

I'm using ReDoc to view Swagger output. It was continually showing my endpoints as:

http://127.0.0.1:9292undefined/v1/list

The only way to fix this was to specifically define the base_path, even though I'm not adding it:

add_swagger_documentation \
    base_path: '/',
    add_base_path: false

[LeFnord]

@boomshadow … which version of grape-swagger you are using?
this is an issue of the old one, but the add_base_path assumes you are using > 0.21.x,
can you clarify it, and if it is version > 0.21.x, can you open an issue, thanks

[boomshadow]

@LeFnord ah, I missed that this was for the older version. Yes, I'm using 0.23.0. I'll open a new issue. Thanks for that.