Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Why is nameof required / why can items not be used directly? #25

Open
hansmbakker opened this issue Jan 3, 2024 · 0 comments
Open

Why is nameof required / why can items not be used directly? #25

hansmbakker opened this issue Jan 3, 2024 · 0 comments

Comments

@hansmbakker
Copy link

I see nameof is required in different places, like with DefaultBindingMode = nameof(BindingMode.TwoWay).

Would it be possible to use the enum itself instead of the string name? I'd say that feel more intuitive - using types directly instead.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
1 participant
@hansmbakker