You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
The PR does not affect readthedocs directly. we are now changing what dnf means, though, before dnf was referring to dnf<5 now it's dnf5.
I was just saying, we have readthedocs which is generated by the same sources. so, should we keep dnf->dnf4 or switch to dnf->dnf5?
it is tricky since the online docs are probably referenced somewhere.
I'd keep dnf.readthedocs.io for dnf4. If it's feasible and straightforward, we could consider adding a mention and link to the new dnf5 pages, e.g. on the title page. What do you think?
I'd keep dnf.readthedocs.io for dnf4. If it's feasible and straightforward, we could consider adding a mention and link to the new dnf5 pages, e.g. on the title page. What do you think?
Originally posted by @jan-kolarik in rpm-software-management/dnf#2072 (comment)
man
references, if any, in the web docs with the appropriate command (e.g.man dnf4
andman dnf
)The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: