-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 63
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add support for inertia in the root link #27
Comments
Related KDL issue/comment: orocos/orocos_kinematics_dynamics#130 (comment) . |
what about adding the fake link in the code and not modifying the origin URDF file/parameter? |
That could be a solution, but as KDL::Tree supports inertia in the root segment, |
Actually this is not completely correct. The existing KDL's API does not support setting the inertia of the RootSegment, rock-control/control-kdl_parser@d1d2507 does it, but kind of hacking around API limitations via the use of |
Original issue: ros/robot_model#6 .
Both the C++ and the Python of the parser throw a warning when a URDF with an non-empty inertial element in its root link is parsed.
For example, the simple one link model:
creates a warning when parsed, and this is the reason why most URDFs files existing actually use a "fake" massless root link, for example:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: