Add transmission_hw_interface to UR xacro and expose everywhere #392
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Adds the capability to select the hardware interface used in the
<transmission>
elements in the URDF model. This allows creating custom simulation setups with different hardware interfaces, e.g.hardware_interface/VelocityJointInterface
.One thing I'm not very happy about is repeating the default value in so many places, but I cannot see a way around this to maintain backwards compatibility for users that use the different bits in this repo: e.g. users of the default
ur10_robot.urdf.xacro
vs users that compose other models using the macro itself.There's also some whitespace changes. Let me know if you prefer I maintain the original lines.