-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 228
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add manufacturer name for MR Solutions #648
Comments
I think this is a duplicate of issue 642 that is addressed in the development branch. You can test this yourself:
|
@halfSpinDoctor your sequence reports Diffusion b-value Attribute (0018,9087), I would also suggest you confirm that the diffusion b-vectors are correctly extracted. These tend to vary by manufacturer and perhaps they even do things different for quadrupeds. I have not seen any validation datasets, so you may want to validate your equipments behavior. |
Yes, apologies about this. I just converted on the development branch and works as expected.
thanks, yes it is a diffusion sequence, and the vectors are different that what we had prescribed on the system. Working to validate this. |
Quick note, in the conversion in the development branch, the bvecs are all 0's (but the bvals are populated and look correct) |
bvec definition is often manufacturer specific. Some vendors specify gradients in world space (Philips, Siemens) and others in Physics coordinate space (GE), while the BIDS/FSL convention is for image space. The DICOM public tag 00189601 is unfortunate as opposite polarities (e.g. [1,0,0] and [-1,0,0]) will create an identical matrix but will have different eddy effects which can be modeled with tools like FSL's Eddy. |
@halfSpinDoctor if you want the bvecs populated you will either need to submit a pull request or provide sample datasets (you can share data with my institutional email. |
I will work on a sample dataset for you to look at, thank you! (Juggling a few things right now, probably will not happen until after Thanksgiving break). |
Describe the bug
Our Varian/Agilent 4.7T preclinical scanner was recently upgraded to MR Solutions. When I convert DICOM output from the scanner, the manufacturer name shows "Philips" instead of "MR Solutions"
Warning: Found 0018,9087 but manufacturer (0008,0070) unknown: assuming Philips.
JSON output shows incorrect manufacturer:
"Manufacturer": "Philips",
To reproduce
Convert data from MR Solutions system.
Expected behavior
Manufacturer should show MR Solutions
Version
Please report the complete version string:
Chris Rorden's dcm2niiX version v1.0.20220720 Clang14.0.0 ARM (64-bit MacOS)
v1.0.20220720
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: