-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 417
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[Feature Request] Socks proxy support #32
Comments
Interesting feature. I would like to use kerbrute more but without proxychains it is kinda limited. |
I have been tackling this issue, and got kind of a workaround: after that I expected that Proxychains will work fine, but it didnt. hope someone will find it useful |
For anyone having this use, you can use tun2sock to route the traffic to the destination to the socks proxy. It's a workaround before the feature is implemented ./tun2socks-linux-amd64 -device tun://tun1 -proxy socks5://127.0.0.1:1080
ip link set tun1 up
ip route add <destination network> dev tun1 |
I use graftcp for this. Proxychains uses LDPRELOAD to hijack linked library calls. Go binaries don't use linked libs, so it doesn't work. Graftcp will hijack syscalls, though, to achieve the same result. |
Someone on Twitter mentioned that kerbrute doesn't work with proxychains. Would be cool to add a proxy option to kerbrute (not sure how well it would, but worth trying)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: