You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Thanks for this amazing binding! I am running into some performance issues and I wonder if you have some hints or ideas.
Basically, the R wrapper works fine but it is very slow. I tried to use furrr and multiprocessing but I have read on the internet that it is not that easy to run many tesseract processing in parallel. Is that true? were you able to run tesseract in parallel already?
Thanks~
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Hi Randomgambit, I have run tesseract in parallel on Windows and it seems to perform pretty well. I tested a 47 page pdf both with and without parallel processing. The function using parallel processing appears to be approximately 70% faster. I've included my code below.
Hello there,
Thanks for this amazing binding! I am running into some performance issues and I wonder if you have some hints or ideas.
Basically, the R wrapper works fine but it is very slow. I tried to use
furrr
and multiprocessing but I have read on the internet that it is not that easy to run many tesseract processing in parallel. Is that true? were you able to runtesseract
in parallel already?Thanks~
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: