Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

DOC: readme consistency (style) #33

Closed
HaoZeke opened this issue Oct 22, 2023 · 0 comments · Fixed by #53
Closed

DOC: readme consistency (style) #33

HaoZeke opened this issue Oct 22, 2023 · 0 comments · Fixed by #53
Labels
documentation Improvements or additions to documentation ropensci-review Issues related to the ROpenSci review
Milestone

Comments

@HaoZeke
Copy link
Member

HaoZeke commented Oct 22, 2023

In the readme: "we support / the package supports". Consider unifying these two wording styles

First noted here: ropensci/software-review#606 (comment).

@HaoZeke HaoZeke added documentation Improvements or additions to documentation ropensci-review Issues related to the ROpenSci review labels Oct 22, 2023
@HaoZeke HaoZeke added this to the v1.0.0 milestone Oct 22, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
documentation Improvements or additions to documentation ropensci-review Issues related to the ROpenSci review
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

1 participant