You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Hello, Dr. Roman.
I've send your email last week.😊
I found it's a nice tool reached the balance between fast calculating, completeness of theory and user-friendly usage.
And i still have some simple problems, hope you could help me solve it.
When I run hetbuilder build -N 5 -t 2 -w 0 CONTCAR_SiO_film CONTCAR_FCC_film on the attachment, I found it cant be controlled by the weight parameters.
First, I found the output didn't changed although different weight, when i use the command line method.
Second, I use the python method to generate series of heterostructure, It's extremelly well controlled by the weight parameter.
And then, I compared the i.stack output between these two methods (see attachement).
Lastly, I find the output of command line methods always consistent with the w = 0.5. It seems like a default value and I couldnt changed it when I run.
And I've read your code carefully, but I couldn't fix this simple bug✨
Looking forward to your reply,
Sincerely,
Louis 😉
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Hello, Dr. Roman.
I've send your email last week.😊
I found it's a nice tool reached the balance between fast calculating, completeness of theory and user-friendly usage.
And i still have some simple problems, hope you could help me solve it.
When I run
hetbuilder build -N 5 -t 2 -w 0 CONTCAR_SiO_film CONTCAR_FCC_film
on the attachment, I found it cant be controlled by the weight parameters.Looking forward to your reply,
Sincerely,
Louis 😉
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: