Utilities to link Django to RDF stores and inferencers.
Why: Allows semantic data models and rules to be used to generate rich views of content, and expose standardised access and query interfaces - such as SPARQL and the Linked Data Platform. Conversely, allow use of Django to manage content in RDF stores :-)
Tested with django 1.11 + python 2.7 and django 3.0 with python 3.8
-
RDF serializer for Django objects driven by editable mapping rules
-
Configurable metadata properties for arbitrary Django objects. RDF_IO has initial data that loads up common W3C namespaces and prefixes ready for use (OWL, RDF, DCAT)
-
Extensible to support specific information models - such as SKOS
-
Publishing to a persistent external triple-store
- RDF4J and LDP API support, extensible by plugin
- Configureable ServiceBindings to RDF store APIs for different CRUD and inferencing tasks
- RDF source load and push to designated RDF store
- chainable inferencing support and persistence handling
- configuration variables scoped to publishing modes to support publishing to different stores for review and final publication
get a working copy with
git clone https://github.com/rob-metalinkage/django-rdf-io
pip install -e (where you put it)
in your master django project:
- add 'rdf_io' to the INSTALLED_APPS in settings.py
- add
url(r"^rdf_io/", include('rdf_io.urls'))
to urls.py - optionally define setting for RDFSERVER and RDFSERVER_API
- run manage.py makemigrations
- run manage.py migrate
This is really only guaranteed for pushing additions and updates - deletions are not handled, although updates will tend to replace statements.
NB - TODO a way to force this to happen automatically - needs to happen after both RDF_IO and the target models are installed, so cant go in initialisation for either model.
{SERVER_URL}/rdf_io/ctl_signals/sync
- check Auto-push flag is checked in an ObjectMapping for that model class
- save - should register a post_save signal for the model class
{SERVER_URL}/rdf_io/ctl_signals/(on/off)
- Define mappings for your target models using the admin interface $SERVER/admin/rdf_io (see below)
- To create an online resource use
{SERVER_URL}/rdf_io/to_rdf/{model_name}/id/{model_id}
{SERVER_URL}/rdf_io/to_rdf/{model_name}/key/{model_natural_key}
Mappings to RDF are done for Django models. Each mapping consists of:
- an identifier mapping to generate the URI for the object
- a set of AttributeMapping elements that map a list of values to a RDF predicate
- a set of EmbeddedMapping that map a list of values to complex object property (optionally wrapped in a blank node)
- a filter to limit the set of objects the mapping applies to
More than one object mapping may exist for a Django model. The RDF graph is the union of all the configured Object Mapping outputs. (Note that a ServiceBinding may be bound to a specific mapping, but the default behaviour is for this to be used to find all ServiceBindings for a gioven django modeltype - and they all get the composite graph (this may be changed to supported publishing different graphs to different RDf stores in future.)
Mapping is non trivial - because the elements of your model may need to extracted from related models
Mapping is from elements in a Django model to a RDF value (a URI or a literal)
source model elements may be defined using XPath-like syntax, with nesting using django filter style __, a__b .(dot) or / notation, where each element of the path may support an optional filter.
path = (literal|element([./]element)*)
literal = "a quoted string" | 'a quoted string' | <a URI>
element = (property|related_model_expr)([filter])?
property = a valid name of a property of a django model
related_model_expr = model_name(\({property}\))?
filter = (field(!)?=literal)((,| AND )field(!)?=literal)* | literal((,| OR )literal)*
Notes:
-
filters on related models will be evaluated within the database using django filters, filters on property values will be performed during serialisation.
-
literal values of None or NULL are treated as None or empty strings, as per Django practice.
-
filters on properties are a simple list of possible matches (, is the same as " OR " ) and apply to the element of the path person.title['MRS','MISS','MS'] would match any title with value "MRS", "MISS", "MS"
-
filters on related objects are property=value syntax. Properties use django-stlye paths - i.e. notation.namespace.prefix=skos
-
if a ManyToMany field is used through an intermediary, then use the related_model_expr - and if this is a self-relation then specify the property : eg. semrelation(origin_concept)[rel_type='1'].target_concept
beta, functionally complete initial capability:
- TTL serialisation of a given model (for which a mapping has been registered)
- Publishing to remote LDP service using per-model templates to define LDP resources
- Autoconfiguring of signals so that objects with mappings are published on post_ save
- syc_remote method to push all objects of list of model types (push is idempotent - safe to repeat)
- sophisticated property-chains with per-level filter options in attribute marmotta
- tested in context of geonode project under django 1.6
- tested against django 1.8.6 and 1.11
todo:
- implement global filters for object mappings (to limit mappings to a subset)
- set up signals and methods to delete objects from remote store
from django.contrib.contenttypes.models import ContentType
from rdflib import Graph
from rdf_io.views import build_rdf
from rdf_io.models import ObjectMapping
from my_app.models import Task
# This example assumes ...
# * you have created a model called `Task` and there’s at least one task
# * you have created a mapping for the Task model
object_to_serialize = Task.objects.first()
content_type = ContentType.objects.get(model='task')
obj_mapping_list = ObjectMapping.objects.filter(content_type=content_type)
graph = Graph()
build_rdf(graph, object_to_serialize, obj_mapping_list, includemembers=True)
print(graph.serialize(format="turtle"))
{SERVER_URL}/rdf_io/to_rdf/{model_name}/{model_id}
- deploy marmotta.war and configure as per Marmotta instructions
- define resource container patterns for different models
e.g.
# RDF triplestore settings
RDFSTORE = {
'default' : {
'server' : "".join((SITEURL,":8080/marmotta" )),
# model and slug are special - slug will revert to id if not present
'target' : "/ldp/{model}/{slug}",
# this could be pulled from settings
'auth' : ('admin', 'pass123')
},
# define special patterns for nested models
'scheme' : {
'target' : "/ldp/voc/{slug}",
},
'concept' : {
'target' : "/ldp/voc/{scheme__slug}/{term}",
}
}
- create containers necessary for patterns (eg /ldp/voc) in the example above
- deploy reasoning rules for target models (to generate additional statements that can be inferred from the published data - this is where the power comes in)
curl -i -H "Content-Type: text/plain" -X POST --data-binary @fixtures/skos.kwrl http://localhost:8080/marmotta/reasoner/program/skos.kwrl
curl -i -X GET http://localhost:8080/marmotta/reasoner/program/skos.kwrl
curl -i -X GET
curl -i -H "Content-Type: text/plain" -X POST --data-binary @skos.skwrl http://localhost:8080/marmotta/reasoner/program/skos.skwrl
If auto_publish is set in an Object Mapping then the RDF-IO mapping is triggered automatically when saving an object once an ObjectMapping is defined for that object type.
A bulk load to the RDF store can be achieved with /rdf_io/sync_remote/{model}(,{model})*
Note that containers need to be create in the right order - so for the SKOS example this must be /rdf_io/sync_remote/scheme,concept
- Apps could define default settings (the mappings to RDF) - and these will just be ignored if the serializer is not present.
- When bringing in the serializer, if you wanted to be able to serialize a Class in an app for which there are no default mappings, it should be possible to define these (create a rdf_mappings.py file in the top project)
- The top project will allow either the default mappings for an app to be overridden, either as a whole or on a per-mapping basis (i.e. change or add mappings for individual attributes)
- the serialiser would be available as a stand-alone serialiser for dumpdata (and extended to be a deserialiser for loaddata) - but also able to be hooked up to post the serialized data to an external service - so my serialiser app might have a model to capture connection parameters for such services - and other app settings would be able to define connections in this model and bind different model's rdf mappings to different target services.
We have four types of apps then: 1 the master project 1 the RDF serializer utility 1 imported apps that have default RDF serializations 1 imported apps that may or may not have RDF serialisations defined in the project settings.
I suspect that this may all be a fairly common pattern - but I've only seen far more heavyweight approaches to RDF trying to fully model RDF and implement SPARQL - all I want to do is spit some stuff out into an external triple-store.
default RDF serialisations are handled by loading initial_data fixtures. RDF_IO objects are defined using natural keys to allow default mappings for modules to be loaded in any order. It may be more elegant to use settings so these defaults can be customised more easily.
Signals are registered when an ObjectMapping is defined for a model.