Could ajv be *optionally* swapped with @cfworker/json-schema?

[fregante]

Prerequisites

• I have read the documentation

What theme are you using?

bootstrap-4

Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.

The issue is that I can't use RJSF in a context that disallows unsafe-eval, as described a few times before.

Describe the solution you'd like

Could RJSF offer validation based on @cfworker/json-schema, for example? I noticed that was made in the v5 branch towards this goal:

• Decouple schema validation from core #2693

This could be offered as an alternative to the built-in ajv-based validation

Describe alternatives you've considered

No response

[heath-freenome]

@fregante Does this still occur with the avj8 validator provided in the beta? Also, one definitely CAN build a validator implementation that uses @cfworker/json-schema. As a small team of volunteers we don't have the bandwidth to build it ourselves, but we would definitely consider adding it to the repo if someone else were to build it and it passes all of the tests with the utils and core libraries. Can we sign you up? :)

[fregante]

According to this issue, v8 still uses unsafe evaluation, so the issue still exists: ajv-validator/ajv#1830

[heath-freenome]

According to this issue, v8 still uses unsafe evaluation, so the issue still exists: ajv-validator/ajv#1830

Lovely... Are you interested in building a validator for @rjsf that uses @cfworker/json-schema?

[joeyJsonar]

We definitely need a custom validator at this point. We cannot precomile as our forms are themselves form so dynamically from an api, so cannot precompile. @heath-freenome

[alfonsoar]

@joeyJsonar @fregante did you ever find a path forward? I'm considering contributing a validator that uses @cfworker/json-schema.

Dynamic pre-compiling is not an option since we need to do this all on the client side.

[fregante]

@alfonsoar I wasn't the one who worked on this in the end. Apparently it was done in pixiebrix/pixiebrix-extension#7081 but I have no knowledge of it.