Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Tracking: binary format bugs and unimplemented features #8213

Closed
2 of 5 tasks
kwannoel opened this issue Feb 28, 2023 · 2 comments · Fixed by #19520
Closed
2 of 5 tasks

Tracking: binary format bugs and unimplemented features #8213

kwannoel opened this issue Feb 28, 2023 · 2 comments · Fixed by #19520
Labels
priority/high type/bug Something isn't working
Milestone

Comments

@kwannoel
Copy link
Contributor

kwannoel commented Feb 28, 2023

Possible motivations/users:

Please enable test cases in

# RisingWave can't support list and struct now so we skip them.
# include ../batch/types/array.slt.part
# include ../batch/types/struct.slt.part
# include ../batch/types/list.slt.part
# Sqllogitest can't support binary format bytea type so we skip it.
# include ../batch/types/bytea.slt.part
# Can't support inf,-inf binary format now so we skip it.
# include ../batch/types/decimal.slt.part
# Sqllogitest can't support binary format jsonb type so we skip it.
# include ../batch/types/jsonb_ord.slt.part
# include ../batch/types/jsonb.slt.part

@kwannoel kwannoel added type/feature type/bug Something isn't working and removed type/feature labels Feb 28, 2023
@github-actions github-actions bot added this to the release-0.1.18 milestone Feb 28, 2023
@kwannoel
Copy link
Contributor Author

Might be higher priority, if users query with parameters (requires extended query mode -> uses binary format) or some integrations require binary format (cr: @jon-chuang ).

https://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/protocol-overview.html#PROTOCOL-QUERY-CONCEPTS

Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Jul 3, 2024

This issue has been open for 60 days with no activity.

If you think it is still relevant today, and needs to be done in the near future, you can comment to update the status, or just manually remove the no-issue-activity label.

You can also confidently close this issue as not planned to keep our backlog clean.
Don't worry if you think the issue is still valuable to continue in the future.
It's searchable and can be reopened when it's time. 😄

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
priority/high type/bug Something isn't working
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

3 participants