-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 453
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Simplify parsing and printing attributes of function and arguments #5783
Conversation
I didn't add the build artifacts of the compiler yet, but CI seems happy. Is it okay? @cknitt |
CI does not enforce the snapshotting. It could also be done separately later. Longer term I would like to have the snapshots removed from the sources, they are actually build artifacts IMHO, and they bloat the repo. |
res_syntax/CHANGELOG.md
Outdated
@@ -13,6 +13,7 @@ | |||
#### :boom: Breaking Change | |||
|
|||
- Emit an error when a `@string` or `@int` attribute is used in a V4 component https://github.com/rescript-lang/rescript-compiler/issues/5724 | |||
- Parse the attributes of labelled argument to the pattern attributes of argument instead of function. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Should change the compiler's changelog instead.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Moved to compiler. 78206f4
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
That's all I have for now.
After moving the log changes to the compiler log, I think it's ready to go.
@mattdamon108 anything else to check?
No. This PR is ready. |
Side comment: The change log in the compiler seems to have something to be cleaned up(multiple breaking changes sections). But I wouldn't clean up in this PR. I don't want to make the CI run all the way again. 😃 |
Moved rescript-lang/syntax#683
Regarding issue #5735