Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

refactor(types): move custom manager types #24324

Merged

Conversation

RahulGautamSingh
Copy link
Collaborator

@RahulGautamSingh RahulGautamSingh commented Sep 8, 2023

distribute types CustomManager and RegexManager

Changes

  • Moved custom manager types inside the manager/custom folder so that it is easy to find and refactor them since they are clser to their sources.
  • Updating interfaces CustomManager and CustomExtractConfig to extends custom manager configs

Context

Part of: #19066

  • Make changes to CustomManager types to simplify adding new custom manager defns to it

Documentation (please check one with an [x])

  • I have updated the documentation, or
  • No documentation update is required

How I've tested my work (please select one)

I have verified these changes via:

  • Code inspection only, or
  • Newly added/modified unit tests, or
  • No unit tests but ran on a real repository, or
  • Both unit tests + ran on a real repository

distribute types CustomManager and RegexManager
Copy link
Member

@viceice viceice left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

otherwise LGTM

lib/modules/manager/custom/regex/strategies.ts Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@rarkins rarkins added this pull request to the merge queue Sep 13, 2023
Merged via the queue into renovatebot:main with commit 2ffbd41 Sep 13, 2023
34 checks passed
@renovate-release
Copy link
Collaborator

🎉 This PR is included in version 36.93.6 🎉

The release is available on:

Your semantic-release bot 📦🚀

@github-actions github-actions bot locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Oct 14, 2023
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants