Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Invert the relationship between the operator and the helm chart #92

Closed
chrisseto opened this issue Mar 19, 2024 · 0 comments
Closed

Invert the relationship between the operator and the helm chart #92

chrisseto opened this issue Mar 19, 2024 · 0 comments
Labels

Comments

@chrisseto
Copy link
Contributor

chrisseto commented Mar 19, 2024

As mentioned in #91, the existing architecture requires us to continuously maintain two different codebases. To rectify that, we'll have to invert the relationship between the operator and the helm chart.

Concretely: This ticket can be closed once the helm chart deploys the operator, a redpanda CRD, and any window dressing that doesn't belong within the operator.

We'll phase this out in a backwards compatible way where the operator and a CRD is first deploy in a "noop" mode. From there, we'll slowly transfer the "ownership" of core resources (Statefulset and the like) into the operator. By utilizing the helm chart's go code, we should be able to seamlessly deploy the resource the same way.

JIRA Link: K8S-199

@chrisseto chrisseto added the epic label Mar 19, 2024
@chrisseto chrisseto closed this as not planned Won't fix, can't repro, duplicate, stale Nov 15, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant