Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Remove unsupported options from Mkdocs project footer #2024

Closed
sahilTakiar opened this issue Feb 28, 2016 · 5 comments
Closed

Remove unsupported options from Mkdocs project footer #2024

sahilTakiar opened this issue Feb 28, 2016 · 5 comments
Milestone

Comments

@sahilTakiar
Copy link

Details

If this issue is for a specific project or build, include the following:

It seems the ReadTheDocs footer is now generated for our project, thanks everyone for the help in #2015 and #2017

Still having a few issues though with the ReadTheDocs footer that is auto-generated:

@agjohnson
Copy link
Contributor

There is no way to currently set these, it should be handled server side. The footer should be altered for mkdocs projects, so I'll triage this as a bug there. We should remove these download options.

The issue with github links is a known issue

@agjohnson agjohnson changed the title ReadTheDocs + MkDocs Issues with ReadTheDocs Auto-Generated Footer Remove unsupported options from Mkdocs project footer Feb 29, 2016
@sahilTakiar
Copy link
Author

Thanks @agjohnson for the explanation. I went ahead and opened on issue on the MkDocs GitHub Repo: mkdocs/mkdocs#849

@agjohnson
Copy link
Contributor

These changes are strictly in Read the Docs, we need to alter how we are passing the flyout content to mkdocs projects

@agjohnson agjohnson added this to the Mkdocs milestone Apr 10, 2018
@agjohnson agjohnson removed the Mkdocs label Apr 10, 2018
@stsewd
Copy link
Member

stsewd commented May 10, 2018

Related to #4041

@stsewd
Copy link
Member

stsewd commented Sep 4, 2018

I don't see the download options for mkdocs projects anymore, only htmlzip (if this option is activated). For the another issue, it's kind of solved, more info in #1820

@stsewd stsewd closed this as completed Sep 4, 2018
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants