Should we rename this repository/package? #645
Archmonger
started this conversation in
Ideas
Replies: 4 comments 10 replies
-
+1 to a name change! I'm not super involved in the project, but I do agree that a different name that implies the reactive nature of this project will help. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
1 reply
-
We'll also need new branding. A first pass logo could be the react atom except the loops around the atomic core are one or more snakes. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
-
Do you plan to keep the dependency on ReactJS? I am asking because it would be very convenient if we could load other JS frameworks like Alpine.js. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
1 reply
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
-
So there's a couple of reasons to consider a rename.
IDOM
does without first knowing what a Documented Oriented Model is, so they might not click on the project. But, IDOM's usage is simple enough to where the user doesn't actually need to understand what a DOM is.Here's a couple potential names that could increase name clarity.
I personally believe having React in the name makes sense for us, since we heavily rely on the ReactJS Client to do anything in the front-end.
Comment below if you have other naming ideas, have a personal favorite name, or if you agree/disagree with this.
If we perform a name change, this should be done sooner rather than later. The longer a package exists, the more difficult a name change becomes.
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions