Should react-dnd try to overcome Parcel bundling issues?

[youknowriad]

Related discussion https://twitter.com/riadbenguella/status/949932743810535424

React DnD is not usable right now with the parcel bundler. This is not an issue with "react-dnd" but more about how Parcel handles/transpiles dependencies. If it finds a .babelrc file on the dependency, it tries to transpile the said package using this config.

React DnD (in parcel) suffers from this issue due to the disposable package here gaearon/disposables#7

I just wanted to ask if you think it's a good idea to try to overcome this by ignoring .babelrc while publishing the modules or should we just wait on a decision from the parcel bundler maintainers. Discussion here parcel-bundler/parcel#13

Thanks

[gaearon]

I wanted to transfer disposables to this org but forgot my password and github locked me out. So I just went ahead and published [email protected] without .babelrc.

I wish we did a better job educating people in the issues about this instead of treating it as a real problem. Just explaining that you're not supposed to be compiling node_modules with Babel would probably be a good idea and save people some confusion in those threads. :-) I understand if the current maintainers didn't have time for this (maybe somebody wants to help?)

[youknowriad]

Closing as this not an issue anymore with [email protected]. Thanks Dan, continuing the discussion about parcel in parcel-bundler/parcel#13