Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Extra residue bonds present in MMTF data from v1.0.9. #54

Open
iclkevin opened this issue May 23, 2021 · 2 comments
Open

Extra residue bonds present in MMTF data from v1.0.9. #54

iclkevin opened this issue May 23, 2021 · 2 comments

Comments

@iclkevin
Copy link

I recently updated to v1.0.9 from v1.0.5 to gain access to the HTTPS ReaderUtils function. I noticed one particular file is now producing extra bonds: 3N4B. There are now a total of 4135 residue bonds produced, instead of the correct 4131. In the rendering, these bonds are incorrect. Everything else in the file appears correct. Any ideas on what the problem may be?

I do not know if the data has changed or if the issue is in a version of the Java MMTF libs >1.0.5 as I cannot test from v1.0.5 anymore with HTTP.
Screen Shot 2021-05-23 at 9 32 17 AM
Screen Shot 2021-05-23 at 9 34 39 AM

@josemduarte
Copy link
Member

This sounds like related to this issue: rcsb/mmtf#44

Just tried and I think the display in pymol looks ok:
Screen Shot 2021-05-26 at 17 04 45

or am looking at the wrong thing?

Important note: mmtf is now under minimal maintenance. The preferred compressed format for PDB data now is BinaryCIF

@iclkevin
Copy link
Author

Thanks, Jose. I will take a closer look when I get some time next week, although it is suspect that the issue is only present on 2 residues out of all. I will download the MMTF file locally and see if I get the same results between MMTF 1.0.5 and 1.0.9.

How much longer will the MMTF services be supported? Should we begin deprecating it?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants