Boot end mode of gpios 28-31 seems to have changed from INPUT to ALT2 #532
Comments
|
Are you using 1-wire (or similar) module? |
|
It seems to be the module snd_soc_bcm2708_i2s. Given I2S uses the PCM perhaps it's not so surprising. When I blacklist that module gpios 28-31remain as inputs at the end of boot. I didn't knowingly make any changes to the sound system (as I never use sound on the Pi). |
|
Yes. That's not entirely desired. We get the same behaviour from I2C/SPI drivers and so raspbian blacklists them by default, so we probably need to do that for i2s as well. Blacklisting is the correct solution for now. |
|
Ok, I'll consider this closed as a kernel issue. |
ED6E0F17
pushed a commit
to ED6E0F17/linux
that referenced
this issue
May 1, 2020
[ Upstream commit 4dee15b ] In the macvlan_device_event(), the list_first_entry_or_null() is used. This function could return null pointer if there is no node. But, the macvlan module doesn't check the null pointer. So, null-ptr-deref would occur. bond0 | +----+-----+ | | macvlan0 macvlan1 | | dummy0 dummy1 The problem scenario. If dummy1 is removed, 1. ->dellink() of dummy1 is called. 2. NETDEV_UNREGISTER of dummy1 notification is sent to macvlan module. 3. ->dellink() of macvlan1 is called. 4. NETDEV_UNREGISTER of macvlan1 notification is sent to bond module. 5. __bond_release_one() is called and it internally calls dev_set_mac_address(). 6. dev_set_mac_address() calls the ->ndo_set_mac_address() of macvlan1, which is macvlan_set_mac_address(). 7. macvlan_set_mac_address() calls the dev_set_mac_address() with dummy1. 8. NETDEV_CHANGEADDR of dummy1 is sent to macvlan module. 9. In the macvlan_device_event(), it calls list_first_entry_or_null(). At this point, dummy1 and macvlan1 were removed. So, list_first_entry_or_null() will return NULL. Test commands: ip netns add nst ip netns exec nst ip link add bond0 type bond for i in {0..10} do ip netns exec nst ip link add dummy$i type dummy ip netns exec nst ip link add macvlan$i link dummy$i \ type macvlan mode passthru ip netns exec nst ip link set macvlan$i master bond0 done ip netns del nst Splat looks like: [ 40.585687][ T146] general protection fault, probably for non-canonical address 0xdffffc0000000000: 0000 [raspberrypi#1] SMP DEI [ 40.587249][ T146] KASAN: null-ptr-deref in range [0x0000000000000000-0x0000000000000007] [ 40.588342][ T146] CPU: 1 PID: 146 Comm: kworker/u8:2 Not tainted 5.7.0-rc1+ raspberrypi#532 [ 40.589299][ T146] Hardware name: innotek GmbH VirtualBox/VirtualBox, BIOS VirtualBox 12/01/2006 [ 40.590469][ T146] Workqueue: netns cleanup_net [ 40.591045][ T146] RIP: 0010:macvlan_device_event+0x4e2/0x900 [macvlan] [ 40.591905][ T146] Code: 00 00 00 00 00 fc ff df 80 3c 06 00 0f 85 45 02 00 00 48 89 da 48 b8 00 00 00 00 00 fc ff d2 [ 40.594126][ T146] RSP: 0018:ffff88806116f4a0 EFLAGS: 00010246 [ 40.594783][ T146] RAX: dffffc0000000000 RBX: 0000000000000000 RCX: 0000000000000000 [ 40.595653][ T146] RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: ffff88806547ddd8 RDI: ffff8880540f1360 [ 40.596495][ T146] RBP: ffff88804011a808 R08: fffffbfff4fb8421 R09: fffffbfff4fb8421 [ 40.597377][ T146] R10: ffffffffa7dc2107 R11: 0000000000000000 R12: 0000000000000008 [ 40.598186][ T146] R13: ffff88804011a000 R14: ffff8880540f1000 R15: 1ffff1100c22de9a [ 40.599012][ T146] FS: 0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff888067800000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 [ 40.600004][ T146] CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 [ 40.600665][ T146] CR2: 00005572d3a807b8 CR3: 000000005fcf4003 CR4: 00000000000606e0 [ 40.601485][ T146] DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000 [ 40.602461][ T146] DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400 [ 40.603443][ T146] Call Trace: [ 40.603871][ T146] ? nf_tables_dump_setelem+0xa0/0xa0 [nf_tables] [ 40.604587][ T146] ? macvlan_uninit+0x100/0x100 [macvlan] [ 40.605212][ T146] ? __module_text_address+0x13/0x140 [ 40.605842][ T146] notifier_call_chain+0x90/0x160 [ 40.606477][ T146] dev_set_mac_address+0x28e/0x3f0 [ 40.607117][ T146] ? netdev_notify_peers+0xc0/0xc0 [ 40.607762][ T146] ? __module_text_address+0x13/0x140 [ 40.608440][ T146] ? notifier_call_chain+0x90/0x160 [ 40.609097][ T146] ? dev_set_mac_address+0x1f0/0x3f0 [ 40.609758][ T146] dev_set_mac_address+0x1f0/0x3f0 [ 40.610402][ T146] ? __local_bh_enable_ip+0xe9/0x1b0 [ 40.611071][ T146] ? bond_hw_addr_flush+0x77/0x100 [bonding] [ 40.611823][ T146] ? netdev_notify_peers+0xc0/0xc0 [ 40.612461][ T146] ? bond_hw_addr_flush+0x77/0x100 [bonding] [ 40.613213][ T146] ? bond_hw_addr_flush+0x77/0x100 [bonding] [ 40.613963][ T146] ? __local_bh_enable_ip+0xe9/0x1b0 [ 40.614631][ T146] ? bond_time_in_interval.isra.31+0x90/0x90 [bonding] [ 40.615484][ T146] ? __bond_release_one+0x9f0/0x12c0 [bonding] [ 40.616230][ T146] __bond_release_one+0x9f0/0x12c0 [bonding] [ 40.616949][ T146] ? bond_enslave+0x47c0/0x47c0 [bonding] [ 40.617642][ T146] ? lock_downgrade+0x730/0x730 [ 40.618218][ T146] ? check_flags.part.42+0x450/0x450 [ 40.618850][ T146] ? __mutex_unlock_slowpath+0xd0/0x670 [ 40.619519][ T146] ? trace_hardirqs_on+0x30/0x180 [ 40.620117][ T146] ? wait_for_completion+0x250/0x250 [ 40.620754][ T146] bond_netdev_event+0x822/0x970 [bonding] [ 40.621460][ T146] ? __module_text_address+0x13/0x140 [ 40.622097][ T146] notifier_call_chain+0x90/0x160 [ 40.622806][ T146] rollback_registered_many+0x660/0xcf0 [ 40.623522][ T146] ? netif_set_real_num_tx_queues+0x780/0x780 [ 40.624290][ T146] ? notifier_call_chain+0x90/0x160 [ 40.624957][ T146] ? netdev_upper_dev_unlink+0x114/0x180 [ 40.625686][ T146] ? __netdev_adjacent_dev_unlink_neighbour+0x30/0x30 [ 40.626421][ T146] ? mutex_is_locked+0x13/0x50 [ 40.627016][ T146] ? unregister_netdevice_queue+0xf2/0x240 [ 40.627663][ T146] unregister_netdevice_many.part.134+0x13/0x1b0 [ 40.628362][ T146] default_device_exit_batch+0x2d9/0x390 [ 40.628987][ T146] ? unregister_netdevice_many+0x40/0x40 [ 40.629615][ T146] ? dev_change_net_namespace+0xcb0/0xcb0 [ 40.630279][ T146] ? prepare_to_wait_exclusive+0x2e0/0x2e0 [ 40.630943][ T146] ? ops_exit_list.isra.9+0x97/0x140 [ 40.631554][ T146] cleanup_net+0x441/0x890 [ ... ] Fixes: e289fd2 ("macvlan: fix the problem when mac address changes for passthru mode") Reported-by: [email protected] Signed-off-by: Taehee Yoo <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]>
popcornmix
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
May 4, 2020
[ Upstream commit 4dee15b ] In the macvlan_device_event(), the list_first_entry_or_null() is used. This function could return null pointer if there is no node. But, the macvlan module doesn't check the null pointer. So, null-ptr-deref would occur. bond0 | +----+-----+ | | macvlan0 macvlan1 | | dummy0 dummy1 The problem scenario. If dummy1 is removed, 1. ->dellink() of dummy1 is called. 2. NETDEV_UNREGISTER of dummy1 notification is sent to macvlan module. 3. ->dellink() of macvlan1 is called. 4. NETDEV_UNREGISTER of macvlan1 notification is sent to bond module. 5. __bond_release_one() is called and it internally calls dev_set_mac_address(). 6. dev_set_mac_address() calls the ->ndo_set_mac_address() of macvlan1, which is macvlan_set_mac_address(). 7. macvlan_set_mac_address() calls the dev_set_mac_address() with dummy1. 8. NETDEV_CHANGEADDR of dummy1 is sent to macvlan module. 9. In the macvlan_device_event(), it calls list_first_entry_or_null(). At this point, dummy1 and macvlan1 were removed. So, list_first_entry_or_null() will return NULL. Test commands: ip netns add nst ip netns exec nst ip link add bond0 type bond for i in {0..10} do ip netns exec nst ip link add dummy$i type dummy ip netns exec nst ip link add macvlan$i link dummy$i \ type macvlan mode passthru ip netns exec nst ip link set macvlan$i master bond0 done ip netns del nst Splat looks like: [ 40.585687][ T146] general protection fault, probably for non-canonical address 0xdffffc0000000000: 0000 [#1] SMP DEI [ 40.587249][ T146] KASAN: null-ptr-deref in range [0x0000000000000000-0x0000000000000007] [ 40.588342][ T146] CPU: 1 PID: 146 Comm: kworker/u8:2 Not tainted 5.7.0-rc1+ #532 [ 40.589299][ T146] Hardware name: innotek GmbH VirtualBox/VirtualBox, BIOS VirtualBox 12/01/2006 [ 40.590469][ T146] Workqueue: netns cleanup_net [ 40.591045][ T146] RIP: 0010:macvlan_device_event+0x4e2/0x900 [macvlan] [ 40.591905][ T146] Code: 00 00 00 00 00 fc ff df 80 3c 06 00 0f 85 45 02 00 00 48 89 da 48 b8 00 00 00 00 00 fc ff d2 [ 40.594126][ T146] RSP: 0018:ffff88806116f4a0 EFLAGS: 00010246 [ 40.594783][ T146] RAX: dffffc0000000000 RBX: 0000000000000000 RCX: 0000000000000000 [ 40.595653][ T146] RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: ffff88806547ddd8 RDI: ffff8880540f1360 [ 40.596495][ T146] RBP: ffff88804011a808 R08: fffffbfff4fb8421 R09: fffffbfff4fb8421 [ 40.597377][ T146] R10: ffffffffa7dc2107 R11: 0000000000000000 R12: 0000000000000008 [ 40.598186][ T146] R13: ffff88804011a000 R14: ffff8880540f1000 R15: 1ffff1100c22de9a [ 40.599012][ T146] FS: 0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff888067800000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 [ 40.600004][ T146] CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 [ 40.600665][ T146] CR2: 00005572d3a807b8 CR3: 000000005fcf4003 CR4: 00000000000606e0 [ 40.601485][ T146] DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000 [ 40.602461][ T146] DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400 [ 40.603443][ T146] Call Trace: [ 40.603871][ T146] ? nf_tables_dump_setelem+0xa0/0xa0 [nf_tables] [ 40.604587][ T146] ? macvlan_uninit+0x100/0x100 [macvlan] [ 40.605212][ T146] ? __module_text_address+0x13/0x140 [ 40.605842][ T146] notifier_call_chain+0x90/0x160 [ 40.606477][ T146] dev_set_mac_address+0x28e/0x3f0 [ 40.607117][ T146] ? netdev_notify_peers+0xc0/0xc0 [ 40.607762][ T146] ? __module_text_address+0x13/0x140 [ 40.608440][ T146] ? notifier_call_chain+0x90/0x160 [ 40.609097][ T146] ? dev_set_mac_address+0x1f0/0x3f0 [ 40.609758][ T146] dev_set_mac_address+0x1f0/0x3f0 [ 40.610402][ T146] ? __local_bh_enable_ip+0xe9/0x1b0 [ 40.611071][ T146] ? bond_hw_addr_flush+0x77/0x100 [bonding] [ 40.611823][ T146] ? netdev_notify_peers+0xc0/0xc0 [ 40.612461][ T146] ? bond_hw_addr_flush+0x77/0x100 [bonding] [ 40.613213][ T146] ? bond_hw_addr_flush+0x77/0x100 [bonding] [ 40.613963][ T146] ? __local_bh_enable_ip+0xe9/0x1b0 [ 40.614631][ T146] ? bond_time_in_interval.isra.31+0x90/0x90 [bonding] [ 40.615484][ T146] ? __bond_release_one+0x9f0/0x12c0 [bonding] [ 40.616230][ T146] __bond_release_one+0x9f0/0x12c0 [bonding] [ 40.616949][ T146] ? bond_enslave+0x47c0/0x47c0 [bonding] [ 40.617642][ T146] ? lock_downgrade+0x730/0x730 [ 40.618218][ T146] ? check_flags.part.42+0x450/0x450 [ 40.618850][ T146] ? __mutex_unlock_slowpath+0xd0/0x670 [ 40.619519][ T146] ? trace_hardirqs_on+0x30/0x180 [ 40.620117][ T146] ? wait_for_completion+0x250/0x250 [ 40.620754][ T146] bond_netdev_event+0x822/0x970 [bonding] [ 40.621460][ T146] ? __module_text_address+0x13/0x140 [ 40.622097][ T146] notifier_call_chain+0x90/0x160 [ 40.622806][ T146] rollback_registered_many+0x660/0xcf0 [ 40.623522][ T146] ? netif_set_real_num_tx_queues+0x780/0x780 [ 40.624290][ T146] ? notifier_call_chain+0x90/0x160 [ 40.624957][ T146] ? netdev_upper_dev_unlink+0x114/0x180 [ 40.625686][ T146] ? __netdev_adjacent_dev_unlink_neighbour+0x30/0x30 [ 40.626421][ T146] ? mutex_is_locked+0x13/0x50 [ 40.627016][ T146] ? unregister_netdevice_queue+0xf2/0x240 [ 40.627663][ T146] unregister_netdevice_many.part.134+0x13/0x1b0 [ 40.628362][ T146] default_device_exit_batch+0x2d9/0x390 [ 40.628987][ T146] ? unregister_netdevice_many+0x40/0x40 [ 40.629615][ T146] ? dev_change_net_namespace+0xcb0/0xcb0 [ 40.630279][ T146] ? prepare_to_wait_exclusive+0x2e0/0x2e0 [ 40.630943][ T146] ? ops_exit_list.isra.9+0x97/0x140 [ 40.631554][ T146] cleanup_net+0x441/0x890 [ ... ] Fixes: e289fd2 ("macvlan: fix the problem when mac address changes for passthru mode") Reported-by: [email protected] Signed-off-by: Taehee Yoo <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]>
popcornmix
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
May 4, 2020
[ Upstream commit 4dee15b ] In the macvlan_device_event(), the list_first_entry_or_null() is used. This function could return null pointer if there is no node. But, the macvlan module doesn't check the null pointer. So, null-ptr-deref would occur. bond0 | +----+-----+ | | macvlan0 macvlan1 | | dummy0 dummy1 The problem scenario. If dummy1 is removed, 1. ->dellink() of dummy1 is called. 2. NETDEV_UNREGISTER of dummy1 notification is sent to macvlan module. 3. ->dellink() of macvlan1 is called. 4. NETDEV_UNREGISTER of macvlan1 notification is sent to bond module. 5. __bond_release_one() is called and it internally calls dev_set_mac_address(). 6. dev_set_mac_address() calls the ->ndo_set_mac_address() of macvlan1, which is macvlan_set_mac_address(). 7. macvlan_set_mac_address() calls the dev_set_mac_address() with dummy1. 8. NETDEV_CHANGEADDR of dummy1 is sent to macvlan module. 9. In the macvlan_device_event(), it calls list_first_entry_or_null(). At this point, dummy1 and macvlan1 were removed. So, list_first_entry_or_null() will return NULL. Test commands: ip netns add nst ip netns exec nst ip link add bond0 type bond for i in {0..10} do ip netns exec nst ip link add dummy$i type dummy ip netns exec nst ip link add macvlan$i link dummy$i \ type macvlan mode passthru ip netns exec nst ip link set macvlan$i master bond0 done ip netns del nst Splat looks like: [ 40.585687][ T146] general protection fault, probably for non-canonical address 0xdffffc0000000000: 0000 [#1] SMP DEI [ 40.587249][ T146] KASAN: null-ptr-deref in range [0x0000000000000000-0x0000000000000007] [ 40.588342][ T146] CPU: 1 PID: 146 Comm: kworker/u8:2 Not tainted 5.7.0-rc1+ #532 [ 40.589299][ T146] Hardware name: innotek GmbH VirtualBox/VirtualBox, BIOS VirtualBox 12/01/2006 [ 40.590469][ T146] Workqueue: netns cleanup_net [ 40.591045][ T146] RIP: 0010:macvlan_device_event+0x4e2/0x900 [macvlan] [ 40.591905][ T146] Code: 00 00 00 00 00 fc ff df 80 3c 06 00 0f 85 45 02 00 00 48 89 da 48 b8 00 00 00 00 00 fc ff d2 [ 40.594126][ T146] RSP: 0018:ffff88806116f4a0 EFLAGS: 00010246 [ 40.594783][ T146] RAX: dffffc0000000000 RBX: 0000000000000000 RCX: 0000000000000000 [ 40.595653][ T146] RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: ffff88806547ddd8 RDI: ffff8880540f1360 [ 40.596495][ T146] RBP: ffff88804011a808 R08: fffffbfff4fb8421 R09: fffffbfff4fb8421 [ 40.597377][ T146] R10: ffffffffa7dc2107 R11: 0000000000000000 R12: 0000000000000008 [ 40.598186][ T146] R13: ffff88804011a000 R14: ffff8880540f1000 R15: 1ffff1100c22de9a [ 40.599012][ T146] FS: 0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff888067800000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 [ 40.600004][ T146] CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 [ 40.600665][ T146] CR2: 00005572d3a807b8 CR3: 000000005fcf4003 CR4: 00000000000606e0 [ 40.601485][ T146] DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000 [ 40.602461][ T146] DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400 [ 40.603443][ T146] Call Trace: [ 40.603871][ T146] ? nf_tables_dump_setelem+0xa0/0xa0 [nf_tables] [ 40.604587][ T146] ? macvlan_uninit+0x100/0x100 [macvlan] [ 40.605212][ T146] ? __module_text_address+0x13/0x140 [ 40.605842][ T146] notifier_call_chain+0x90/0x160 [ 40.606477][ T146] dev_set_mac_address+0x28e/0x3f0 [ 40.607117][ T146] ? netdev_notify_peers+0xc0/0xc0 [ 40.607762][ T146] ? __module_text_address+0x13/0x140 [ 40.608440][ T146] ? notifier_call_chain+0x90/0x160 [ 40.609097][ T146] ? dev_set_mac_address+0x1f0/0x3f0 [ 40.609758][ T146] dev_set_mac_address+0x1f0/0x3f0 [ 40.610402][ T146] ? __local_bh_enable_ip+0xe9/0x1b0 [ 40.611071][ T146] ? bond_hw_addr_flush+0x77/0x100 [bonding] [ 40.611823][ T146] ? netdev_notify_peers+0xc0/0xc0 [ 40.612461][ T146] ? bond_hw_addr_flush+0x77/0x100 [bonding] [ 40.613213][ T146] ? bond_hw_addr_flush+0x77/0x100 [bonding] [ 40.613963][ T146] ? __local_bh_enable_ip+0xe9/0x1b0 [ 40.614631][ T146] ? bond_time_in_interval.isra.31+0x90/0x90 [bonding] [ 40.615484][ T146] ? __bond_release_one+0x9f0/0x12c0 [bonding] [ 40.616230][ T146] __bond_release_one+0x9f0/0x12c0 [bonding] [ 40.616949][ T146] ? bond_enslave+0x47c0/0x47c0 [bonding] [ 40.617642][ T146] ? lock_downgrade+0x730/0x730 [ 40.618218][ T146] ? check_flags.part.42+0x450/0x450 [ 40.618850][ T146] ? __mutex_unlock_slowpath+0xd0/0x670 [ 40.619519][ T146] ? trace_hardirqs_on+0x30/0x180 [ 40.620117][ T146] ? wait_for_completion+0x250/0x250 [ 40.620754][ T146] bond_netdev_event+0x822/0x970 [bonding] [ 40.621460][ T146] ? __module_text_address+0x13/0x140 [ 40.622097][ T146] notifier_call_chain+0x90/0x160 [ 40.622806][ T146] rollback_registered_many+0x660/0xcf0 [ 40.623522][ T146] ? netif_set_real_num_tx_queues+0x780/0x780 [ 40.624290][ T146] ? notifier_call_chain+0x90/0x160 [ 40.624957][ T146] ? netdev_upper_dev_unlink+0x114/0x180 [ 40.625686][ T146] ? __netdev_adjacent_dev_unlink_neighbour+0x30/0x30 [ 40.626421][ T146] ? mutex_is_locked+0x13/0x50 [ 40.627016][ T146] ? unregister_netdevice_queue+0xf2/0x240 [ 40.627663][ T146] unregister_netdevice_many.part.134+0x13/0x1b0 [ 40.628362][ T146] default_device_exit_batch+0x2d9/0x390 [ 40.628987][ T146] ? unregister_netdevice_many+0x40/0x40 [ 40.629615][ T146] ? dev_change_net_namespace+0xcb0/0xcb0 [ 40.630279][ T146] ? prepare_to_wait_exclusive+0x2e0/0x2e0 [ 40.630943][ T146] ? ops_exit_list.isra.9+0x97/0x140 [ 40.631554][ T146] cleanup_net+0x441/0x890 [ ... ] Fixes: e289fd2 ("macvlan: fix the problem when mac address changes for passthru mode") Reported-by: [email protected] Signed-off-by: Taehee Yoo <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]>
margro
pushed a commit
to margro/linux
that referenced
this issue
May 31, 2020
[ Upstream commit 4dee15b ] In the macvlan_device_event(), the list_first_entry_or_null() is used. This function could return null pointer if there is no node. But, the macvlan module doesn't check the null pointer. So, null-ptr-deref would occur. bond0 | +----+-----+ | | macvlan0 macvlan1 | | dummy0 dummy1 The problem scenario. If dummy1 is removed, 1. ->dellink() of dummy1 is called. 2. NETDEV_UNREGISTER of dummy1 notification is sent to macvlan module. 3. ->dellink() of macvlan1 is called. 4. NETDEV_UNREGISTER of macvlan1 notification is sent to bond module. 5. __bond_release_one() is called and it internally calls dev_set_mac_address(). 6. dev_set_mac_address() calls the ->ndo_set_mac_address() of macvlan1, which is macvlan_set_mac_address(). 7. macvlan_set_mac_address() calls the dev_set_mac_address() with dummy1. 8. NETDEV_CHANGEADDR of dummy1 is sent to macvlan module. 9. In the macvlan_device_event(), it calls list_first_entry_or_null(). At this point, dummy1 and macvlan1 were removed. So, list_first_entry_or_null() will return NULL. Test commands: ip netns add nst ip netns exec nst ip link add bond0 type bond for i in {0..10} do ip netns exec nst ip link add dummy$i type dummy ip netns exec nst ip link add macvlan$i link dummy$i \ type macvlan mode passthru ip netns exec nst ip link set macvlan$i master bond0 done ip netns del nst Splat looks like: [ 40.585687][ T146] general protection fault, probably for non-canonical address 0xdffffc0000000000: 0000 [raspberrypi#1] SMP DEI [ 40.587249][ T146] KASAN: null-ptr-deref in range [0x0000000000000000-0x0000000000000007] [ 40.588342][ T146] CPU: 1 PID: 146 Comm: kworker/u8:2 Not tainted 5.7.0-rc1+ raspberrypi#532 [ 40.589299][ T146] Hardware name: innotek GmbH VirtualBox/VirtualBox, BIOS VirtualBox 12/01/2006 [ 40.590469][ T146] Workqueue: netns cleanup_net [ 40.591045][ T146] RIP: 0010:macvlan_device_event+0x4e2/0x900 [macvlan] [ 40.591905][ T146] Code: 00 00 00 00 00 fc ff df 80 3c 06 00 0f 85 45 02 00 00 48 89 da 48 b8 00 00 00 00 00 fc ff d2 [ 40.594126][ T146] RSP: 0018:ffff88806116f4a0 EFLAGS: 00010246 [ 40.594783][ T146] RAX: dffffc0000000000 RBX: 0000000000000000 RCX: 0000000000000000 [ 40.595653][ T146] RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: ffff88806547ddd8 RDI: ffff8880540f1360 [ 40.596495][ T146] RBP: ffff88804011a808 R08: fffffbfff4fb8421 R09: fffffbfff4fb8421 [ 40.597377][ T146] R10: ffffffffa7dc2107 R11: 0000000000000000 R12: 0000000000000008 [ 40.598186][ T146] R13: ffff88804011a000 R14: ffff8880540f1000 R15: 1ffff1100c22de9a [ 40.599012][ T146] FS: 0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff888067800000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 [ 40.600004][ T146] CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 [ 40.600665][ T146] CR2: 00005572d3a807b8 CR3: 000000005fcf4003 CR4: 00000000000606e0 [ 40.601485][ T146] DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000 [ 40.602461][ T146] DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400 [ 40.603443][ T146] Call Trace: [ 40.603871][ T146] ? nf_tables_dump_setelem+0xa0/0xa0 [nf_tables] [ 40.604587][ T146] ? macvlan_uninit+0x100/0x100 [macvlan] [ 40.605212][ T146] ? __module_text_address+0x13/0x140 [ 40.605842][ T146] notifier_call_chain+0x90/0x160 [ 40.606477][ T146] dev_set_mac_address+0x28e/0x3f0 [ 40.607117][ T146] ? netdev_notify_peers+0xc0/0xc0 [ 40.607762][ T146] ? __module_text_address+0x13/0x140 [ 40.608440][ T146] ? notifier_call_chain+0x90/0x160 [ 40.609097][ T146] ? dev_set_mac_address+0x1f0/0x3f0 [ 40.609758][ T146] dev_set_mac_address+0x1f0/0x3f0 [ 40.610402][ T146] ? __local_bh_enable_ip+0xe9/0x1b0 [ 40.611071][ T146] ? bond_hw_addr_flush+0x77/0x100 [bonding] [ 40.611823][ T146] ? netdev_notify_peers+0xc0/0xc0 [ 40.612461][ T146] ? bond_hw_addr_flush+0x77/0x100 [bonding] [ 40.613213][ T146] ? bond_hw_addr_flush+0x77/0x100 [bonding] [ 40.613963][ T146] ? __local_bh_enable_ip+0xe9/0x1b0 [ 40.614631][ T146] ? bond_time_in_interval.isra.31+0x90/0x90 [bonding] [ 40.615484][ T146] ? __bond_release_one+0x9f0/0x12c0 [bonding] [ 40.616230][ T146] __bond_release_one+0x9f0/0x12c0 [bonding] [ 40.616949][ T146] ? bond_enslave+0x47c0/0x47c0 [bonding] [ 40.617642][ T146] ? lock_downgrade+0x730/0x730 [ 40.618218][ T146] ? check_flags.part.42+0x450/0x450 [ 40.618850][ T146] ? __mutex_unlock_slowpath+0xd0/0x670 [ 40.619519][ T146] ? trace_hardirqs_on+0x30/0x180 [ 40.620117][ T146] ? wait_for_completion+0x250/0x250 [ 40.620754][ T146] bond_netdev_event+0x822/0x970 [bonding] [ 40.621460][ T146] ? __module_text_address+0x13/0x140 [ 40.622097][ T146] notifier_call_chain+0x90/0x160 [ 40.622806][ T146] rollback_registered_many+0x660/0xcf0 [ 40.623522][ T146] ? netif_set_real_num_tx_queues+0x780/0x780 [ 40.624290][ T146] ? notifier_call_chain+0x90/0x160 [ 40.624957][ T146] ? netdev_upper_dev_unlink+0x114/0x180 [ 40.625686][ T146] ? __netdev_adjacent_dev_unlink_neighbour+0x30/0x30 [ 40.626421][ T146] ? mutex_is_locked+0x13/0x50 [ 40.627016][ T146] ? unregister_netdevice_queue+0xf2/0x240 [ 40.627663][ T146] unregister_netdevice_many.part.134+0x13/0x1b0 [ 40.628362][ T146] default_device_exit_batch+0x2d9/0x390 [ 40.628987][ T146] ? unregister_netdevice_many+0x40/0x40 [ 40.629615][ T146] ? dev_change_net_namespace+0xcb0/0xcb0 [ 40.630279][ T146] ? prepare_to_wait_exclusive+0x2e0/0x2e0 [ 40.630943][ T146] ? ops_exit_list.isra.9+0x97/0x140 [ 40.631554][ T146] cleanup_net+0x441/0x890 [ ... ] Fixes: e289fd2 ("macvlan: fix the problem when mac address changes for passthru mode") Reported-by: [email protected] Signed-off-by: Taehee Yoo <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]>
popcornmix
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Jan 2, 2024
[ Upstream commit 1469417 ] Trying to suspend to RAM on SAMA5D27 EVK leads to the following lockdep warning: ============================================ WARNING: possible recursive locking detected 6.7.0-rc5-wt+ #532 Not tainted -------------------------------------------- sh/92 is trying to acquire lock: c3cf306c (&irq_desc_lock_class){-.-.}-{2:2}, at: __irq_get_desc_lock+0xe8/0x100 but task is already holding lock: c3d7c46c (&irq_desc_lock_class){-.-.}-{2:2}, at: __irq_get_desc_lock+0xe8/0x100 other info that might help us debug this: Possible unsafe locking scenario: CPU0 ---- lock(&irq_desc_lock_class); lock(&irq_desc_lock_class); *** DEADLOCK *** May be due to missing lock nesting notation 6 locks held by sh/92: #0: c3aa0258 (sb_writers#6){.+.+}-{0:0}, at: ksys_write+0xd8/0x178 #1: c4c2df44 (&of->mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: kernfs_fop_write_iter+0x138/0x284 #2: c32684a0 (kn->active){.+.+}-{0:0}, at: kernfs_fop_write_iter+0x148/0x284 #3: c232b6d4 (system_transition_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: pm_suspend+0x13c/0x4e8 #4: c387b088 (&dev->mutex){....}-{3:3}, at: __device_suspend+0x1e8/0x91c #5: c3d7c46c (&irq_desc_lock_class){-.-.}-{2:2}, at: __irq_get_desc_lock+0xe8/0x100 stack backtrace: CPU: 0 PID: 92 Comm: sh Not tainted 6.7.0-rc5-wt+ #532 Hardware name: Atmel SAMA5 unwind_backtrace from show_stack+0x18/0x1c show_stack from dump_stack_lvl+0x34/0x48 dump_stack_lvl from __lock_acquire+0x19ec/0x3a0c __lock_acquire from lock_acquire.part.0+0x124/0x2d0 lock_acquire.part.0 from _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x5c/0x78 _raw_spin_lock_irqsave from __irq_get_desc_lock+0xe8/0x100 __irq_get_desc_lock from irq_set_irq_wake+0xa8/0x204 irq_set_irq_wake from atmel_gpio_irq_set_wake+0x58/0xb4 atmel_gpio_irq_set_wake from irq_set_irq_wake+0x100/0x204 irq_set_irq_wake from gpio_keys_suspend+0xec/0x2b8 gpio_keys_suspend from dpm_run_callback+0xe4/0x248 dpm_run_callback from __device_suspend+0x234/0x91c __device_suspend from dpm_suspend+0x224/0x43c dpm_suspend from dpm_suspend_start+0x9c/0xa8 dpm_suspend_start from suspend_devices_and_enter+0x1e0/0xa84 suspend_devices_and_enter from pm_suspend+0x460/0x4e8 pm_suspend from state_store+0x78/0xe4 state_store from kernfs_fop_write_iter+0x1a0/0x284 kernfs_fop_write_iter from vfs_write+0x38c/0x6f4 vfs_write from ksys_write+0xd8/0x178 ksys_write from ret_fast_syscall+0x0/0x1c Exception stack(0xc52b3fa8 to 0xc52b3ff0) 3fa0: 00000004 005a0ae8 00000001 005a0ae8 00000004 00000001 3fc0: 00000004 005a0ae8 00000001 00000004 00000004 b6c616c0 00000020 0059d190 3fe0: 00000004 b6c61678 aec5a041 aebf1a26 This warning is raised because pinctrl-at91-pio4 uses chained IRQ. Whenever a wake up source configures an IRQ through irq_set_irq_wake, it will lock the corresponding IRQ desc, and then call irq_set_irq_wake on "parent" IRQ which will do the same on its own IRQ desc, but since those two locks share the same class, lockdep reports this as an issue. Fix lockdep false positive by setting a different class for parent and children IRQ Fixes: 7761808 ("pinctrl: introduce driver for Atmel PIO4 controller") Signed-off-by: Alexis Lothoré <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <[email protected]>
popcornmix
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Jan 2, 2024
[ Upstream commit 1469417 ] Trying to suspend to RAM on SAMA5D27 EVK leads to the following lockdep warning: ============================================ WARNING: possible recursive locking detected 6.7.0-rc5-wt+ #532 Not tainted -------------------------------------------- sh/92 is trying to acquire lock: c3cf306c (&irq_desc_lock_class){-.-.}-{2:2}, at: __irq_get_desc_lock+0xe8/0x100 but task is already holding lock: c3d7c46c (&irq_desc_lock_class){-.-.}-{2:2}, at: __irq_get_desc_lock+0xe8/0x100 other info that might help us debug this: Possible unsafe locking scenario: CPU0 ---- lock(&irq_desc_lock_class); lock(&irq_desc_lock_class); *** DEADLOCK *** May be due to missing lock nesting notation 6 locks held by sh/92: #0: c3aa0258 (sb_writers#6){.+.+}-{0:0}, at: ksys_write+0xd8/0x178 #1: c4c2df44 (&of->mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: kernfs_fop_write_iter+0x138/0x284 #2: c32684a0 (kn->active){.+.+}-{0:0}, at: kernfs_fop_write_iter+0x148/0x284 #3: c232b6d4 (system_transition_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: pm_suspend+0x13c/0x4e8 #4: c387b088 (&dev->mutex){....}-{3:3}, at: __device_suspend+0x1e8/0x91c #5: c3d7c46c (&irq_desc_lock_class){-.-.}-{2:2}, at: __irq_get_desc_lock+0xe8/0x100 stack backtrace: CPU: 0 PID: 92 Comm: sh Not tainted 6.7.0-rc5-wt+ #532 Hardware name: Atmel SAMA5 unwind_backtrace from show_stack+0x18/0x1c show_stack from dump_stack_lvl+0x34/0x48 dump_stack_lvl from __lock_acquire+0x19ec/0x3a0c __lock_acquire from lock_acquire.part.0+0x124/0x2d0 lock_acquire.part.0 from _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x5c/0x78 _raw_spin_lock_irqsave from __irq_get_desc_lock+0xe8/0x100 __irq_get_desc_lock from irq_set_irq_wake+0xa8/0x204 irq_set_irq_wake from atmel_gpio_irq_set_wake+0x58/0xb4 atmel_gpio_irq_set_wake from irq_set_irq_wake+0x100/0x204 irq_set_irq_wake from gpio_keys_suspend+0xec/0x2b8 gpio_keys_suspend from dpm_run_callback+0xe4/0x248 dpm_run_callback from __device_suspend+0x234/0x91c __device_suspend from dpm_suspend+0x224/0x43c dpm_suspend from dpm_suspend_start+0x9c/0xa8 dpm_suspend_start from suspend_devices_and_enter+0x1e0/0xa84 suspend_devices_and_enter from pm_suspend+0x460/0x4e8 pm_suspend from state_store+0x78/0xe4 state_store from kernfs_fop_write_iter+0x1a0/0x284 kernfs_fop_write_iter from vfs_write+0x38c/0x6f4 vfs_write from ksys_write+0xd8/0x178 ksys_write from ret_fast_syscall+0x0/0x1c Exception stack(0xc52b3fa8 to 0xc52b3ff0) 3fa0: 00000004 005a0ae8 00000001 005a0ae8 00000004 00000001 3fc0: 00000004 005a0ae8 00000001 00000004 00000004 b6c616c0 00000020 0059d190 3fe0: 00000004 b6c61678 aec5a041 aebf1a26 This warning is raised because pinctrl-at91-pio4 uses chained IRQ. Whenever a wake up source configures an IRQ through irq_set_irq_wake, it will lock the corresponding IRQ desc, and then call irq_set_irq_wake on "parent" IRQ which will do the same on its own IRQ desc, but since those two locks share the same class, lockdep reports this as an issue. Fix lockdep false positive by setting a different class for parent and children IRQ Fixes: 7761808 ("pinctrl: introduce driver for Atmel PIO4 controller") Signed-off-by: Alexis Lothoré <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <[email protected]>
comeillfoo
pushed a commit
to comeillfoo/linux-rpi
that referenced
this issue
Jan 8, 2024
[ Upstream commit 1469417 ] Trying to suspend to RAM on SAMA5D27 EVK leads to the following lockdep warning: ============================================ WARNING: possible recursive locking detected 6.7.0-rc5-wt+ raspberrypi#532 Not tainted -------------------------------------------- sh/92 is trying to acquire lock: c3cf306c (&irq_desc_lock_class){-.-.}-{2:2}, at: __irq_get_desc_lock+0xe8/0x100 but task is already holding lock: c3d7c46c (&irq_desc_lock_class){-.-.}-{2:2}, at: __irq_get_desc_lock+0xe8/0x100 other info that might help us debug this: Possible unsafe locking scenario: CPU0 ---- lock(&irq_desc_lock_class); lock(&irq_desc_lock_class); *** DEADLOCK *** May be due to missing lock nesting notation 6 locks held by sh/92: #0: c3aa0258 (sb_writers#6){.+.+}-{0:0}, at: ksys_write+0xd8/0x178 raspberrypi#1: c4c2df44 (&of->mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: kernfs_fop_write_iter+0x138/0x284 raspberrypi#2: c32684a0 (kn->active){.+.+}-{0:0}, at: kernfs_fop_write_iter+0x148/0x284 raspberrypi#3: c232b6d4 (system_transition_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: pm_suspend+0x13c/0x4e8 raspberrypi#4: c387b088 (&dev->mutex){....}-{3:3}, at: __device_suspend+0x1e8/0x91c raspberrypi#5: c3d7c46c (&irq_desc_lock_class){-.-.}-{2:2}, at: __irq_get_desc_lock+0xe8/0x100 stack backtrace: CPU: 0 PID: 92 Comm: sh Not tainted 6.7.0-rc5-wt+ raspberrypi#532 Hardware name: Atmel SAMA5 unwind_backtrace from show_stack+0x18/0x1c show_stack from dump_stack_lvl+0x34/0x48 dump_stack_lvl from __lock_acquire+0x19ec/0x3a0c __lock_acquire from lock_acquire.part.0+0x124/0x2d0 lock_acquire.part.0 from _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x5c/0x78 _raw_spin_lock_irqsave from __irq_get_desc_lock+0xe8/0x100 __irq_get_desc_lock from irq_set_irq_wake+0xa8/0x204 irq_set_irq_wake from atmel_gpio_irq_set_wake+0x58/0xb4 atmel_gpio_irq_set_wake from irq_set_irq_wake+0x100/0x204 irq_set_irq_wake from gpio_keys_suspend+0xec/0x2b8 gpio_keys_suspend from dpm_run_callback+0xe4/0x248 dpm_run_callback from __device_suspend+0x234/0x91c __device_suspend from dpm_suspend+0x224/0x43c dpm_suspend from dpm_suspend_start+0x9c/0xa8 dpm_suspend_start from suspend_devices_and_enter+0x1e0/0xa84 suspend_devices_and_enter from pm_suspend+0x460/0x4e8 pm_suspend from state_store+0x78/0xe4 state_store from kernfs_fop_write_iter+0x1a0/0x284 kernfs_fop_write_iter from vfs_write+0x38c/0x6f4 vfs_write from ksys_write+0xd8/0x178 ksys_write from ret_fast_syscall+0x0/0x1c Exception stack(0xc52b3fa8 to 0xc52b3ff0) 3fa0: 00000004 005a0ae8 00000001 005a0ae8 00000004 00000001 3fc0: 00000004 005a0ae8 00000001 00000004 00000004 b6c616c0 00000020 0059d190 3fe0: 00000004 b6c61678 aec5a041 aebf1a26 This warning is raised because pinctrl-at91-pio4 uses chained IRQ. Whenever a wake up source configures an IRQ through irq_set_irq_wake, it will lock the corresponding IRQ desc, and then call irq_set_irq_wake on "parent" IRQ which will do the same on its own IRQ desc, but since those two locks share the same class, lockdep reports this as an issue. Fix lockdep false positive by setting a different class for parent and children IRQ Fixes: 7761808 ("pinctrl: introduce driver for Atmel PIO4 controller") Signed-off-by: Alexis Lothoré <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <[email protected]>
popcornmix
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Jan 17, 2024
Trying to suspend to RAM on SAMA5D27 EVK leads to the following lockdep warning: ============================================ WARNING: possible recursive locking detected 6.7.0-rc5-wt+ #532 Not tainted -------------------------------------------- sh/92 is trying to acquire lock: c3cf306c (&irq_desc_lock_class){-.-.}-{2:2}, at: __irq_get_desc_lock+0xe8/0x100 but task is already holding lock: c3d7c46c (&irq_desc_lock_class){-.-.}-{2:2}, at: __irq_get_desc_lock+0xe8/0x100 other info that might help us debug this: Possible unsafe locking scenario: CPU0 ---- lock(&irq_desc_lock_class); lock(&irq_desc_lock_class); *** DEADLOCK *** May be due to missing lock nesting notation 6 locks held by sh/92: #0: c3aa0258 (sb_writers#6){.+.+}-{0:0}, at: ksys_write+0xd8/0x178 #1: c4c2df44 (&of->mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: kernfs_fop_write_iter+0x138/0x284 #2: c32684a0 (kn->active){.+.+}-{0:0}, at: kernfs_fop_write_iter+0x148/0x284 #3: c232b6d4 (system_transition_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: pm_suspend+0x13c/0x4e8 #4: c387b088 (&dev->mutex){....}-{3:3}, at: __device_suspend+0x1e8/0x91c #5: c3d7c46c (&irq_desc_lock_class){-.-.}-{2:2}, at: __irq_get_desc_lock+0xe8/0x100 stack backtrace: CPU: 0 PID: 92 Comm: sh Not tainted 6.7.0-rc5-wt+ #532 Hardware name: Atmel SAMA5 unwind_backtrace from show_stack+0x18/0x1c show_stack from dump_stack_lvl+0x34/0x48 dump_stack_lvl from __lock_acquire+0x19ec/0x3a0c __lock_acquire from lock_acquire.part.0+0x124/0x2d0 lock_acquire.part.0 from _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x5c/0x78 _raw_spin_lock_irqsave from __irq_get_desc_lock+0xe8/0x100 __irq_get_desc_lock from irq_set_irq_wake+0xa8/0x204 irq_set_irq_wake from atmel_gpio_irq_set_wake+0x58/0xb4 atmel_gpio_irq_set_wake from irq_set_irq_wake+0x100/0x204 irq_set_irq_wake from gpio_keys_suspend+0xec/0x2b8 gpio_keys_suspend from dpm_run_callback+0xe4/0x248 dpm_run_callback from __device_suspend+0x234/0x91c __device_suspend from dpm_suspend+0x224/0x43c dpm_suspend from dpm_suspend_start+0x9c/0xa8 dpm_suspend_start from suspend_devices_and_enter+0x1e0/0xa84 suspend_devices_and_enter from pm_suspend+0x460/0x4e8 pm_suspend from state_store+0x78/0xe4 state_store from kernfs_fop_write_iter+0x1a0/0x284 kernfs_fop_write_iter from vfs_write+0x38c/0x6f4 vfs_write from ksys_write+0xd8/0x178 ksys_write from ret_fast_syscall+0x0/0x1c Exception stack(0xc52b3fa8 to 0xc52b3ff0) 3fa0: 00000004 005a0ae8 00000001 005a0ae8 00000004 00000001 3fc0: 00000004 005a0ae8 00000001 00000004 00000004 b6c616c0 00000020 0059d190 3fe0: 00000004 b6c61678 aec5a041 aebf1a26 This warning is raised because pinctrl-at91-pio4 uses chained IRQ. Whenever a wake up source configures an IRQ through irq_set_irq_wake, it will lock the corresponding IRQ desc, and then call irq_set_irq_wake on "parent" IRQ which will do the same on its own IRQ desc, but since those two locks share the same class, lockdep reports this as an issue. Fix lockdep false positive by setting a different class for parent and children IRQ Fixes: 7761808 ("pinctrl: introduce driver for Atmel PIO4 controller") Signed-off-by: Alexis Lothoré <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <[email protected]>
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Some time between May 2013 and today (probably a couple of months ago) the mode of gpios 28, 29, 30, and 31 appears to have changed from INPUT to ALT2.
A consequence is that gpio28 transmits the PCM clock once PCM is enabled.
I went back to the last Debian image dated May 2013 and booted. Gpios 28-31 were mode INPUT. I performed an rpi-update and rebooted. Gpios 28-31 were mode ALT2.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: