Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

A Friendly Note on Which AMS Version to Use #707

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Nov 20, 2014

Conversation

jherdman
Copy link
Contributor

Per the discussion in #702, I figured it might be nice to note which version of AMS is recommended to be used in new projects.

ready, but it's not. You probably don't want to use it yet.
ready, but it's not. You probably don't want to use it yet. As such, we recommend
that any new projects you start use the latest `0.8.x` version of this gem. This
version is most widely used, and will most closely resemble the forthcoming release.
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

My 2c is that "is the most widely used" would sound better to me.

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

👍

@jherdman
Copy link
Contributor Author

Bump

@hoetmaaiers
Copy link

I there a roadmap to the 0.10.0 release?

@steveklabnik
Copy link
Contributor

There isn't currently a timeline, but @kurko 's employer is chipping in with some time, so hopefully it will all continue steadily along.

@steveklabnik
Copy link
Contributor

And @jherdman , we need the 'the' and I'll click merge :)

Per the discussion in rails-api#702, I figured it might be nice to note which
version of AMS is recommended to be used in new projects.
@jherdman
Copy link
Contributor Author

Updated! Many thanks.

steveklabnik added a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 20, 2014
A Friendly Note on Which AMS Version to Use
@steveklabnik steveklabnik merged commit 8bbf6b8 into rails-api:master Nov 20, 2014
@steveklabnik
Copy link
Contributor

Thank you! :D

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants