Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add a mask-setter property #869

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

keflavich
Copy link
Contributor

This error:
https://github.com/radio-astro-tools/spectral-cube/actions/runs/4375133747/jobs/7655452694#step:5:2644
may be caused by not having a settable mask.

We really need to resolve this with the #808 refactor, but I want passing tests as a stopgap

to set the mask attribute but being blocked from doing so
@codecov-commenter
Copy link

Codecov Report

Patch coverage: 66.66% and project coverage change: -0.01 ⚠️

Comparison is base (d004d79) 77.36% compared to head (66ccaa9) 77.36%.

📣 This organization is not using Codecov’s GitHub App Integration. We recommend you install it so Codecov can continue to function properly for your repositories. Learn more

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master     #869      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   77.36%   77.36%   -0.01%     
==========================================
  Files          24       24              
  Lines        6027     6030       +3     
==========================================
+ Hits         4663     4665       +2     
- Misses       1364     1365       +1     
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
spectral_cube/base_class.py 85.93% <66.66%> (-0.18%) ⬇️

Help us with your feedback. Take ten seconds to tell us how you rate us. Have a feature suggestion? Share it here.

☔ View full report at Codecov.
📢 Do you have feedback about the report comment? Let us know in this issue.

@keflavich
Copy link
Contributor Author

I'm going to merge this into #854 and try to resolve everything there

@e-koch
Copy link
Contributor

e-koch commented Mar 11, 2023

@keflavich good to close this in favour of #854?

@e-koch e-koch mentioned this pull request Mar 11, 2023
@keflavich
Copy link
Contributor Author

Yep.

@keflavich keflavich closed this Mar 11, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants